#94314: ""One or Two Dutch" and "Extra Roles" Variant Setups"

• Kopieer en plak alsjeblieft de foutboodschap die je op je scherm ziet, indien van toepassing.
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Leg uit wat je wilde doen, wat je deed en wat er gebeurde
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Mozilla v5

• Kopieer en plak alsjeblieft de tekst die in het Engels wordt getoond in plaats van in jouw taal. Als je een schermafbeelding van deze bug hebt (goede gewoonte), kun je Imgur.com gebruiken om deze te uploaden, de link kopiëren en hier plakken.
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Is deze tekst beschikbaar in het vertaalsysteem? Zo ja, is deze meer dan 24 uur geleden vertaald?
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Mozilla v5

• Gelieve jouw suggestie precies en beknopt uit te leggen zodat het zo makkelijk mogelijk is om te begrijpen wat je bedoelt.
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Mozilla v5

• Wat stond op het scherm toen je geblokkeerd was (Leeg scherm? Een deel van de spelinterface? Foutboodschap?)
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Mozilla v5

• Met welk onderdeel van de regels is geen rekening gehouden bij de BGA-versie?
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Is de inbreuk op de spelregels zichtbaar in de spelherhaling? Indien ja, bij welk zetnummer?
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Mozilla v5

• Welke spelactie wilde je uitvoeren?
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Wat probeerde je te doen om deze spelactie te laten optreden?
• Wat gebeurde er toen je dit probeerde te doen (foutboodschap, melding op de statusbalk van het spel, ...)?
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Mozilla v5

• In welke fase van het spel deed het probleem zich voor (wat was de huidige spelinstructie)?
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Wat gebeurde toen je deze spelactie probeerde (foutboodschap, melding op de statusbalk van het spel, ...)?
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Mozilla v5

• Beschrijf alsjeblieft het probleem met de beeldweergave. Als je een schermafbeelding van deze bug hebt (goede gewoonte), kun je Imgur.com gebruiken om deze te uploaden, de link kopiëren en hier plakken.
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Mozilla v5

• Kopieer en plak alsjeblieft de tekst die in het Engels wordt getoond in plaats van in jouw taal. Als je een schermafbeelding van deze bug hebt (goede gewoonte), kun je Imgur.com gebruiken om deze te uploaden, de link kopiëren en hier plakken.
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Is deze tekst beschikbaar in het vertaalsysteem? Zo ja, is deze meer dan 24 uur geleden vertaald?
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Mozilla v5

• Gelieve jouw suggestie precies en beknopt uit te leggen zodat het zo makkelijk mogelijk is om te begrijpen wat je bedoelt.
Again, great job implementing this game so far!

I came across an unofficial variant that was discussed on the BGG threads for this game.

In an eight player game they used two Dutch players, which seemed to work well. Having two of them would certainly make the game tighter all the way up to the very end. I think this could even work well in a six player game (three teams of two of each).

There's also the uneven distribution variant, where there are more cards than players, so you never know what the correct distribution or roles is; five players, six role cards, etc.

Providing players setting up the table with a few possibilities as to how to set the game up provides for a lot of replay value.

*I'm also uncertain of the publisher's stance on such options, so it may not even be possible to implement these, but they're fun to consider.
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Mozilla v5

Waarover gaat dit rapport?

Wat is er gebeurd? Selecteer uit het onderstaande

Wat is er gebeurd? Selecteer uit het onderstaande

Controleer of er al een rapport is over hetzelfde onderwerp

Gedetailleerde beschrijving

Rapportgeschiedenis

Dit rapport aanvullen

Wijzig rapportstatus naar:

Help

Draag bij

Volg ons