#95801: "Objective abundant not scored properly"
Waarover gaat dit rapport?
Wat is er gebeurd? Selecteer uit het onderstaande
Wat is er gebeurd? Selecteer uit het onderstaande
Gelieve na te kijken of er reeds een rapport bestaat met hetzelfde onderwerp
Zo ja, gelieve dan voor dit rapport te STEMMEN. Rapporten met de meeste stemmen krijgen VOORRANG!
# | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
---|
Gedetailleerde beschrijving
• Kopieer en plak alsjeblieft de foutboodschap die je op je scherm ziet, indien van toepassing.
Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly.• Leg uit wat je wilde doen, wat je deed en wat er gebeurde
Still in game...• Welke browser gebruik je?
Google Chrome v112
• Kopieer en plak alsjeblieft de tekst die in het Engels wordt getoond in plaats van in jouw taal. Als je een schermafbeelding van deze bug hebt (goede gewoonte), kun je Imgur.com gebruiken om deze te uploaden, de link kopiëren en hier plakken.
Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly.• Is deze tekst beschikbaar in het vertaalsysteem? Zo ja, is deze meer dan 24 uur geleden vertaald?
Still in game...• Welke browser gebruik je?
Google Chrome v112
• Gelieve jouw suggestie precies en beknopt uit te leggen zodat het zo makkelijk mogelijk is om te begrijpen wat je bedoelt.
Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly.• Welke browser gebruik je?
Google Chrome v112
• Wat stond op het scherm toen je geblokkeerd was (Leeg scherm? Een deel van de spelinterface? Foutboodschap?)
Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly.• Welke browser gebruik je?
Google Chrome v112
• Met welk onderdeel van de regels is geen rekening gehouden bij de BGA-versie?
Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly.• Is de inbreuk op de spelregels zichtbaar in de spelherhaling? Indien ja, bij welk zetnummer?
Still in game...• Welke browser gebruik je?
Google Chrome v112
• Welke spelactie wilde je uitvoeren?
Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly.• Wat probeerde je te doen om deze spelactie te laten optreden?
Still in game...• Wat gebeurde er toen je dit probeerde te doen (foutboodschap, melding op de statusbalk van het spel, ...)?
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Google Chrome v112
• In welke fase van het spel deed het probleem zich voor (wat was de huidige spelinstructie)?
Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly.• Wat gebeurde toen je deze spelactie probeerde (foutboodschap, melding op de statusbalk van het spel, ...)?
Still in game...• Welke browser gebruik je?
Google Chrome v112
• Beschrijf alsjeblieft het probleem met de beeldweergave. Als je een schermafbeelding van deze bug hebt (goede gewoonte), kun je Imgur.com gebruiken om deze te uploaden, de link kopiëren en hier plakken.
Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly.• Welke browser gebruik je?
Google Chrome v112
• Kopieer en plak alsjeblieft de tekst die in het Engels wordt getoond in plaats van in jouw taal. Als je een schermafbeelding van deze bug hebt (goede gewoonte), kun je Imgur.com gebruiken om deze te uploaden, de link kopiëren en hier plakken.
Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly.• Is deze tekst beschikbaar in het vertaalsysteem? Zo ja, is deze meer dan 24 uur geleden vertaald?
Still in game...• Welke browser gebruik je?
Google Chrome v112
• Gelieve jouw suggestie precies en beknopt uit te leggen zodat het zo makkelijk mogelijk is om te begrijpen wat je bedoelt.
Objective "abundant" - most food spent on buildings.
The only face up buildings with food costs were statute (3 food) owned by me, and Yatai (2 food) owned by the opponent. I activated the objective scoring and it said tie or not realized. There was also a face down building (school - 1 food previously owned by my opponent) but the "most buildings" objective ignored this one and worked properly.• Welke browser gebruik je?
Google Chrome v112
Rapportgeschiedenis
Move #51
Progression 86%
Opulent still works the old way - i.e. opponent sold a building but it still counted for Gold spent. Cost me the game!!
Thank you
Move #46
Progression 57%
Still counting sold buildings for the Opulent objective
Move #53
Progression 57%
Opulent Did work as intended. Which surprised us as it hadn't worked last game!!
Dit rapport aanvullen
- Andere tafel ID / zet ID
- Loste F5 het probleem op?
- Kwam het probleem meerdere keren voor? Altijd? Willekeurig?
- Als je een schermafbeelding van deze bug hebt (goede gewoonte), kun je Imgur.com gebruiken om deze te uploaden, de link kopiëren en hier plakken.