• Kopieer en plak alsjeblieft de foutboodschap die je op je scherm ziet, indien van toepassing.

I play a lot of 2-people games, and I'm tired of opponents who "concede victory" around the end of the game :

- No penalty for them
- No score calculation
- No good statistics to analyze
- It's just rude, no one would do that IRL

My proposal is to make it impossible to concede victory at about 85%/90% of the progression of the game. Thus, it makes it possible to concede before (in case of emergencies for example) but not at the end just to annoy the other player / not lose ELO.

• Leg uit wat je wilde doen, wat je deed en wat er gebeurde

• Welke browser gebruik je?

• Kopieer en plak alsjeblieft de tekst die in het Engels wordt getoond in plaats van in jouw taal. Als je een screenshot van de bug hebt (goede gewoonte), kun je een afbeeldingswebsite gebruiken (bijvoorbeeld snipboard.io) om deze te uploaden en de link hier te delen. Is deze tekst beschikbaar in het vertaalsysteem? Zo ja, is deze meer dan 24 uur geleden vertaald?

I play a lot of 2-people games, and I'm tired of opponents who "concede victory" around the end of the game :

- No penalty for them
- No score calculation
- No good statistics to analyze
- It's just rude, no one would do that IRL

My proposal is to make it impossible to concede victory at about 85%/90% of the progression of the game. Thus, it makes it possible to concede before (in case of emergencies for example) but not at the end just to annoy the other player / not lose ELO.

• Welke browser gebruik je?

• Gelieve jouw suggestie precies en beknopt uit te leggen zodat het zo makkelijk mogelijk is om te begrijpen wat je bedoelt.

I play a lot of 2-people games, and I'm tired of opponents who "concede victory" around the end of the game :

- No penalty for them
- No score calculation
- No good statistics to analyze
- It's just rude, no one would do that IRL

My proposal is to make it impossible to concede victory at about 85%/90% of the progression of the game. Thus, it makes it possible to concede before (in case of emergencies for example) but not at the end just to annoy the other player / not lose ELO.

• Welke browser gebruik je?

• Wat stond op het scherm toen je geblokkeerd was (Leeg scherm? Een deel van de spelinterface? Foutboodschap?)

I play a lot of 2-people games, and I'm tired of opponents who "concede victory" around the end of the game :

- No penalty for them
- No score calculation
- No good statistics to analyze
- It's just rude, no one would do that IRL

My proposal is to make it impossible to concede victory at about 85%/90% of the progression of the game. Thus, it makes it possible to concede before (in case of emergencies for example) but not at the end just to annoy the other player / not lose ELO.

• Welke browser gebruik je?

• Met welk onderdeel van de regels is geen rekening gehouden bij de BGA-versie?

I play a lot of 2-people games, and I'm tired of opponents who "concede victory" around the end of the game :

- No penalty for them
- No score calculation
- No good statistics to analyze
- It's just rude, no one would do that IRL

My proposal is to make it impossible to concede victory at about 85%/90% of the progression of the game. Thus, it makes it possible to concede before (in case of emergencies for example) but not at the end just to annoy the other player / not lose ELO.

• Is de inbreuk op de spelregels zichtbaar in de spelherhaling? Indien ja, bij welk zetnummer?

• Welke browser gebruik je?

• Welke spelactie wilde je uitvoeren?

I play a lot of 2-people games, and I'm tired of opponents who "concede victory" around the end of the game :

- No penalty for them
- No score calculation
- No good statistics to analyze
- It's just rude, no one would do that IRL

My proposal is to make it impossible to concede victory at about 85%/90% of the progression of the game. Thus, it makes it possible to concede before (in case of emergencies for example) but not at the end just to annoy the other player / not lose ELO.

• Wat probeerde je te doen om deze spelactie te laten optreden?

• Wat gebeurde er toen je dit probeerde te doen (foutboodschap, melding op de statusbalk van het spel, ...)?

• Welke browser gebruik je?

• In welke fase van het spel deed het probleem zich voor (wat was de huidige spelinstructie)?

I play a lot of 2-people games, and I'm tired of opponents who "concede victory" around the end of the game :

- No penalty for them
- No score calculation
- No good statistics to analyze
- It's just rude, no one would do that IRL

My proposal is to make it impossible to concede victory at about 85%/90% of the progression of the game. Thus, it makes it possible to concede before (in case of emergencies for example) but not at the end just to annoy the other player / not lose ELO.

• Wat gebeurde toen je deze spelactie probeerde (foutboodschap, melding op de statusbalk van het spel, ...)?

• Welke browser gebruik je?

• Beschrijf alsjeblieft het probleem met de beeldweergave. Als je een screenshot van de bug hebt (goede gewoonte), kun je een afbeeldingswebsite gebruiken (bijvoorbeeld snipboard.io) om deze te uploaden en de link hier te delen.

I play a lot of 2-people games, and I'm tired of opponents who "concede victory" around the end of the game :

- No penalty for them
- No score calculation
- No good statistics to analyze
- It's just rude, no one would do that IRL

My proposal is to make it impossible to concede victory at about 85%/90% of the progression of the game. Thus, it makes it possible to concede before (in case of emergencies for example) but not at the end just to annoy the other player / not lose ELO.

• Welke browser gebruik je?

• Kopieer en plak alsjeblieft de tekst die in het Engels wordt getoond in plaats van in jouw taal. Als je een screenshot van de bug hebt (goede gewoonte), kun je een afbeeldingswebsite gebruiken (bijvoorbeeld snipboard.io) om deze te uploaden en de link hier te delen. Is deze tekst beschikbaar in het vertaalsysteem? Zo ja, is deze meer dan 24 uur geleden vertaald?

I play a lot of 2-people games, and I'm tired of opponents who "concede victory" around the end of the game :

- No penalty for them
- No score calculation
- No good statistics to analyze
- It's just rude, no one would do that IRL

My proposal is to make it impossible to concede victory at about 85%/90% of the progression of the game. Thus, it makes it possible to concede before (in case of emergencies for example) but not at the end just to annoy the other player / not lose ELO.

• Welke browser gebruik je?

• Gelieve jouw suggestie precies en beknopt uit te leggen zodat het zo makkelijk mogelijk is om te begrijpen wat je bedoelt.

I play a lot of 2-people games, and I'm tired of opponents who "concede victory" around the end of the game :

- No penalty for them
- No score calculation
- No good statistics to analyze
- It's just rude, no one would do that IRL

My proposal is to make it impossible to concede victory at about 85%/90% of the progression of the game. Thus, it makes it possible to concede before (in case of emergencies for example) but not at the end just to annoy the other player / not lose ELO.

• Welke browser gebruik je?