Rapport • Board Game Arena

Alle rapporten

Reflections in the Looking Glass rapporten

#82856: "Provide verification of move "

rejected: De ontwikkelaars denken dat dit geen goed idee is of dat de kosten/batenratio te hoog is

Waarover gaat dit rapport?

Reflections in the Looking Glass #351874367

Wat is er gebeurd? Selecteer uit het onderstaande

Suggestie: volgens mij zou het volgende de implementatie van dit spel enorm verbeteren

Wat is er gebeurd? Selecteer uit het onderstaande

Suggestie: volgens mij zou het volgende de implementatie van dit spel enorm verbeteren

Controleer of er al een rapport is over hetzelfde onderwerp

Zo ja, gelieve dan voor dit rapport te STEMMEN. Rapporten met de meeste stemmen krijgen VOORRANG!

#	Status	Votes	Game	Type	Title	Last update

Gedetailleerde beschrijving

Rapportgeschiedenis

6 Mar 2023 16:26 • rafiki_33 • De ontwikkelaars hebben deze suggestie nog niet geanalyseerd:

6 Mar 2023 22:02 • RyTracer • De ontwikkelaars willen graag meer informatie over deze suggestie:

I read these guidelines in the studio wiki:
en.doc.boardgamearena.com/BGA_Studio_Guidelines#II-6_Avoid_move_confirmations

and it seems to me that selecting a card doesn't qualify for a confirm action. It happens on every turn and really isn't that complex. So I'd ask for more information about why users might want this and how it should work. There are 2 ways this might be handled:

A. You click on a card and it highlights the card, then you click "confirm" above and the move is executed.
B. You click on the card and the move is executed, then above in the bar you are given 2 options: "Confirm", which would have an automatic 5 or 10-second countdown timer, and "Undo", which would take the move back if clicked in time. I would not do this without the timer, as this would definitely fall in the "bogs the game down" category of the guidelines document.

These options would potentially fix the following issues:
1. The card zones are too close together and you sometimes mis-click on an adjacent card. I'm guessing this isn't the issue, but would be fixed by both A and B.
2. You realize after the card arrives in your pile that you miscalculated how many you already had, maybe by not considering your hand cards. This would likely not be fixed by A, only B, but is also fixed by just getting better at the game. In all games here and in real life, we sometimes have remorse after a bad move.
3. rafiki_33 said they sometimes click the reflection card opposite the one they want. That seems odd to me. What is more intuitive than clicking the card you actually want? More elaboration please. This may also be solved by just gaining a little more experience with the game.

Another thought I have considered if it is issue #2, is that your hand cards could actually be shown in your score piles per player, but not showing to the other player or to spectators, but this definitely violates the guideline here:

en.doc.boardgamearena.com/BGA_Studio_Guidelines#III-2_Be_careful_about_player_assistance

So... this long post is justifying my decision so far to not include any kind of move confirmation. The game is short, and you might get another opportunity to still win even if you blunder a round. I believe if I had a move confirmation, after you became more comfortable with the game, you would probably want it gone later. But, I am not 100% set on this, so please clarify your issue and proposed solution choices, even if they are not listed here.

Thanks! And I appreciate all this wonderful feedback!

6 Mar 2023 22:41 • rafiki_33 • De ontwikkelaars willen graag meer informatie over deze suggestie:

You've got it right in my case (#3) - I think it's a training issue. :)

If you'd implement it, I think it would be option B that you mentioned above - just to verify the card you're taking and the card you're giving - with said timer, and said option to turn on/off.

The game should be okay without, but it would help the mindless like me. Thanks for the quick reply.

8 Mar 2023 00:10 • whatsherface6 • De ontwikkelaars willen graag meer informatie over deze suggestie:

Since the game doesn't involve multiple actions per turn (there is only one action on your turn) I don't think a confirm button is necessary as it might be in other games. And honestly, I'm all about the least number of clicks to accomplish the task as possible. Call me lazy haha ; ).

8 Mar 2023 00:23 • RyTracer • De ontwikkelaars denken dat dit geen goed idee is of dat de kosten/batenratio te hoog is:

For now, I'm rejecting adding a confirmation option.

Dit rapport aanvullen

Gelieve hier alle informatie toe te voegen die relevant is om deze bug te reproduceren of jouw suggestie te begrijpen:

Andere tafel ID / zet ID
Loste F5 het probleem op?
Kwam het probleem meerdere keren voor? Altijd? Willekeurig?
Als je een schermkopie van deze bug hebt (goede gewoonte), kun je een hosting-service voor afbeeldingen naar keuze gebruiken (bijvoorbeeld snipboard.io) om deze te uploaden en de link hier te kopiëren/plakken.

Annuleer Werk rapport bij

#82856: "Provide verification of move "

Waarover gaat dit rapport?

Wat is er gebeurd? Selecteer uit het onderstaande

Wat is er gebeurd? Selecteer uit het onderstaande

Controleer of er al een rapport is over hetzelfde onderwerp

Gedetailleerde beschrijving

Rapportgeschiedenis

Dit rapport aanvullen

Wijzig rapportstatus naar:

Help

Draag bij

Navigeren

Volg ons