#72332: "improved layout for after-game dice statistics (with proposed mock-up)"
Waarover gaat dit rapport?
Wat is er gebeurd? Selecteer uit het onderstaande
Wat is er gebeurd? Selecteer uit het onderstaande
Controleer of er al een rapport is over hetzelfde onderwerp
Zo ja, gelieve dan voor dit rapport te STEMMEN. Rapporten met de meeste stemmen krijgen VOORRANG!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Gedetailleerde beschrijving
-
• Kopieer en plak alsjeblieft de foutboodschap die je op je scherm ziet, indien van toepassing.
After each game, this is how the dice statistics are laid out: snipboard.io/8gX2oL.jpg
Here is my proposed improvement: snipboard.io/uc5LQM.jpg
Advantages:
(1) the counts of each sum are labelled and distinguishable from the percentages (in the current format, the percent sign is not used, leaving players confused about whether the figures shown are percentages or not);
(2) the horizontal "grid" layout is more compact than the existing vertical "list" layout;
(3) the "expected percentage" is clearly labelled (instead of the tilde symbol in the current format, which some people might not understand.
Instead of the term "expected percentage", you may wish to use the phrase "long-term average" or something similar.
This suggestion supersedes boardgamearena.com/bug?id=64097 (which is obsolete). -
• Leg uit wat je wilde doen, wat je deed en wat er gebeurde
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Firefox for Windows
-
• Kopieer en plak alsjeblieft de tekst die in het Engels wordt getoond in plaats van in jouw taal. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Is deze tekst beschikbaar in het vertaalsysteem? Zo ja, is deze meer dan 24 uur geleden vertaald?
After each game, this is how the dice statistics are laid out: snipboard.io/8gX2oL.jpg
Here is my proposed improvement: snipboard.io/uc5LQM.jpg
Advantages:
(1) the counts of each sum are labelled and distinguishable from the percentages (in the current format, the percent sign is not used, leaving players confused about whether the figures shown are percentages or not);
(2) the horizontal "grid" layout is more compact than the existing vertical "list" layout;
(3) the "expected percentage" is clearly labelled (instead of the tilde symbol in the current format, which some people might not understand.
Instead of the term "expected percentage", you may wish to use the phrase "long-term average" or something similar.
This suggestion supersedes boardgamearena.com/bug?id=64097 (which is obsolete). • Welke browser gebruik je?
Firefox for Windows
-
• Gelieve jouw suggestie precies en beknopt uit te leggen zodat het zo makkelijk mogelijk is om te begrijpen wat je bedoelt.
After each game, this is how the dice statistics are laid out: snipboard.io/8gX2oL.jpg
Here is my proposed improvement: snipboard.io/uc5LQM.jpg
Advantages:
(1) the counts of each sum are labelled and distinguishable from the percentages (in the current format, the percent sign is not used, leaving players confused about whether the figures shown are percentages or not);
(2) the horizontal "grid" layout is more compact than the existing vertical "list" layout;
(3) the "expected percentage" is clearly labelled (instead of the tilde symbol in the current format, which some people might not understand.
Instead of the term "expected percentage", you may wish to use the phrase "long-term average" or something similar.
This suggestion supersedes boardgamearena.com/bug?id=64097 (which is obsolete). • Welke browser gebruik je?
Firefox for Windows
-
• Wat stond op het scherm toen je geblokkeerd was (Leeg scherm? Een deel van de spelinterface? Foutboodschap?)
After each game, this is how the dice statistics are laid out: snipboard.io/8gX2oL.jpg
Here is my proposed improvement: snipboard.io/uc5LQM.jpg
Advantages:
(1) the counts of each sum are labelled and distinguishable from the percentages (in the current format, the percent sign is not used, leaving players confused about whether the figures shown are percentages or not);
(2) the horizontal "grid" layout is more compact than the existing vertical "list" layout;
(3) the "expected percentage" is clearly labelled (instead of the tilde symbol in the current format, which some people might not understand.
Instead of the term "expected percentage", you may wish to use the phrase "long-term average" or something similar.
This suggestion supersedes boardgamearena.com/bug?id=64097 (which is obsolete). • Welke browser gebruik je?
Firefox for Windows
-
• Met welk onderdeel van de regels is geen rekening gehouden bij de BGA-versie?
After each game, this is how the dice statistics are laid out: snipboard.io/8gX2oL.jpg
Here is my proposed improvement: snipboard.io/uc5LQM.jpg
Advantages:
(1) the counts of each sum are labelled and distinguishable from the percentages (in the current format, the percent sign is not used, leaving players confused about whether the figures shown are percentages or not);
(2) the horizontal "grid" layout is more compact than the existing vertical "list" layout;
(3) the "expected percentage" is clearly labelled (instead of the tilde symbol in the current format, which some people might not understand.
Instead of the term "expected percentage", you may wish to use the phrase "long-term average" or something similar.
This suggestion supersedes boardgamearena.com/bug?id=64097 (which is obsolete). -
• Is de inbreuk op de spelregels zichtbaar in de spelherhaling? Indien ja, bij welk zetnummer?
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Firefox for Windows
-
• Welke spelactie wilde je uitvoeren?
After each game, this is how the dice statistics are laid out: snipboard.io/8gX2oL.jpg
Here is my proposed improvement: snipboard.io/uc5LQM.jpg
Advantages:
(1) the counts of each sum are labelled and distinguishable from the percentages (in the current format, the percent sign is not used, leaving players confused about whether the figures shown are percentages or not);
(2) the horizontal "grid" layout is more compact than the existing vertical "list" layout;
(3) the "expected percentage" is clearly labelled (instead of the tilde symbol in the current format, which some people might not understand.
Instead of the term "expected percentage", you may wish to use the phrase "long-term average" or something similar.
This suggestion supersedes boardgamearena.com/bug?id=64097 (which is obsolete). -
• Wat probeerde je te doen om deze spelactie te laten optreden?
-
• Wat gebeurde er toen je dit probeerde te doen (foutboodschap, melding op de statusbalk van het spel, ...)?
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Firefox for Windows
-
• In welke fase van het spel deed het probleem zich voor (wat was de huidige spelinstructie)?
After each game, this is how the dice statistics are laid out: snipboard.io/8gX2oL.jpg
Here is my proposed improvement: snipboard.io/uc5LQM.jpg
Advantages:
(1) the counts of each sum are labelled and distinguishable from the percentages (in the current format, the percent sign is not used, leaving players confused about whether the figures shown are percentages or not);
(2) the horizontal "grid" layout is more compact than the existing vertical "list" layout;
(3) the "expected percentage" is clearly labelled (instead of the tilde symbol in the current format, which some people might not understand.
Instead of the term "expected percentage", you may wish to use the phrase "long-term average" or something similar.
This suggestion supersedes boardgamearena.com/bug?id=64097 (which is obsolete). -
• Wat gebeurde toen je deze spelactie probeerde (foutboodschap, melding op de statusbalk van het spel, ...)?
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Firefox for Windows
-
• Beschrijf alsjeblieft het probleem met de beeldweergave. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
After each game, this is how the dice statistics are laid out: snipboard.io/8gX2oL.jpg
Here is my proposed improvement: snipboard.io/uc5LQM.jpg
Advantages:
(1) the counts of each sum are labelled and distinguishable from the percentages (in the current format, the percent sign is not used, leaving players confused about whether the figures shown are percentages or not);
(2) the horizontal "grid" layout is more compact than the existing vertical "list" layout;
(3) the "expected percentage" is clearly labelled (instead of the tilde symbol in the current format, which some people might not understand.
Instead of the term "expected percentage", you may wish to use the phrase "long-term average" or something similar.
This suggestion supersedes boardgamearena.com/bug?id=64097 (which is obsolete). • Welke browser gebruik je?
Firefox for Windows
-
• Kopieer en plak alsjeblieft de tekst die in het Engels wordt getoond in plaats van in jouw taal. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Is deze tekst beschikbaar in het vertaalsysteem? Zo ja, is deze meer dan 24 uur geleden vertaald?
After each game, this is how the dice statistics are laid out: snipboard.io/8gX2oL.jpg
Here is my proposed improvement: snipboard.io/uc5LQM.jpg
Advantages:
(1) the counts of each sum are labelled and distinguishable from the percentages (in the current format, the percent sign is not used, leaving players confused about whether the figures shown are percentages or not);
(2) the horizontal "grid" layout is more compact than the existing vertical "list" layout;
(3) the "expected percentage" is clearly labelled (instead of the tilde symbol in the current format, which some people might not understand.
Instead of the term "expected percentage", you may wish to use the phrase "long-term average" or something similar.
This suggestion supersedes boardgamearena.com/bug?id=64097 (which is obsolete). • Welke browser gebruik je?
Firefox for Windows
-
• Gelieve jouw suggestie precies en beknopt uit te leggen zodat het zo makkelijk mogelijk is om te begrijpen wat je bedoelt.
After each game, this is how the dice statistics are laid out: snipboard.io/8gX2oL.jpg
Here is my proposed improvement: snipboard.io/uc5LQM.jpg
Advantages:
(1) the counts of each sum are labelled and distinguishable from the percentages (in the current format, the percent sign is not used, leaving players confused about whether the figures shown are percentages or not);
(2) the horizontal "grid" layout is more compact than the existing vertical "list" layout;
(3) the "expected percentage" is clearly labelled (instead of the tilde symbol in the current format, which some people might not understand.
Instead of the term "expected percentage", you may wish to use the phrase "long-term average" or something similar.
This suggestion supersedes boardgamearena.com/bug?id=64097 (which is obsolete). • Welke browser gebruik je?
Firefox for Windows
Rapportgeschiedenis
In effect, the omission of the % symbol and the rounding to the nearest percentage point leads people to assume that a game had, perhaps 98 or 101 rolls, rather than 50 or 60 which is typical. Then you can do the math correctly and you find that the probability of no 9's being rolled is about 1 in 100,000, assuming 98 rolls per game. But on BGA, it occurs around once in 400 games (since the true number of rolls per game is usually 50 or 60). This can lead them to believe that the dice algorithm is either buggy or rigged.
Examples:
boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=125351#p125351
boardgamearena.com/bug?id=66082
boardgamearena.com/bug?id=67316
boardgamearena.com/bug?id=70809
Dit rapport aanvullen
- Andere tafel ID / zet ID
- Loste F5 het probleem op?
- Kwam het probleem meerdere keren voor? Altijd? Willekeurig?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
