#34833: "Board positioning: avoid requiring scrolling where possible"
Waarover gaat dit rapport?
Wat is er gebeurd? Selecteer uit het onderstaande
Wat is er gebeurd? Selecteer uit het onderstaande
Controleer of er al een rapport is over hetzelfde onderwerp
Zo ja, gelieve dan voor dit rapport te STEMMEN. Rapporten met de meeste stemmen krijgen VOORRANG!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Gedetailleerde beschrijving
-
• Kopieer en plak alsjeblieft de foutboodschap die je op je scherm ziet, indien van toepassing.
The sliders to change the sizes of the boards seem like a good idea, but my experience of trying to find a suitable size is that the problem isn't the board size but their position. It seems that the boards of the players to my left and right align with the bottom of the screen, and the boards of the fourth (and fifth, if applicable) player(s) go below the bottom of the screen unless using really tiny sizes.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-initial-sizes.png and cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-aligns-bottom.png show how making the opponent boards smaller pushes them down.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-fixed-margin.png was the best that I could manage to get the boards to fit on screen without scrolling, and even then I had to scroll down a little and lose some of the header. This is with a maximised browser window on a 1920x1080 screen.
For desktop I think that it would work to have just one slider, for my own board size, and to fit the opponent boards into the left and right margins by calculating the scale factor which lets them both fit vertically, and the scale factor which lets them fit horizontally, and choosing the smaller of the two. I've made a mockup at cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-mockup.png which shows how much larger the boards can be without scrolling. -
• Leg uit wat je wilde doen, wat je deed en wat er gebeurde
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Google Chrome v79
-
• Kopieer en plak alsjeblieft de tekst die in het Engels wordt getoond in plaats van in jouw taal. Als je een screenshot van de bug hebt (goede gewoonte), kun je een afbeeldingswebsite gebruiken (bijvoorbeeld snipboard.io) om deze te uploaden en de link hier te delen. Is deze tekst beschikbaar in het vertaalsysteem? Zo ja, is deze meer dan 24 uur geleden vertaald?
The sliders to change the sizes of the boards seem like a good idea, but my experience of trying to find a suitable size is that the problem isn't the board size but their position. It seems that the boards of the players to my left and right align with the bottom of the screen, and the boards of the fourth (and fifth, if applicable) player(s) go below the bottom of the screen unless using really tiny sizes.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-initial-sizes.png and cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-aligns-bottom.png show how making the opponent boards smaller pushes them down.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-fixed-margin.png was the best that I could manage to get the boards to fit on screen without scrolling, and even then I had to scroll down a little and lose some of the header. This is with a maximised browser window on a 1920x1080 screen.
For desktop I think that it would work to have just one slider, for my own board size, and to fit the opponent boards into the left and right margins by calculating the scale factor which lets them both fit vertically, and the scale factor which lets them fit horizontally, and choosing the smaller of the two. I've made a mockup at cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-mockup.png which shows how much larger the boards can be without scrolling. • Welke browser gebruik je?
Google Chrome v79
-
• Gelieve jouw suggestie precies en beknopt uit te leggen zodat het zo makkelijk mogelijk is om te begrijpen wat je bedoelt.
The sliders to change the sizes of the boards seem like a good idea, but my experience of trying to find a suitable size is that the problem isn't the board size but their position. It seems that the boards of the players to my left and right align with the bottom of the screen, and the boards of the fourth (and fifth, if applicable) player(s) go below the bottom of the screen unless using really tiny sizes.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-initial-sizes.png and cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-aligns-bottom.png show how making the opponent boards smaller pushes them down.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-fixed-margin.png was the best that I could manage to get the boards to fit on screen without scrolling, and even then I had to scroll down a little and lose some of the header. This is with a maximised browser window on a 1920x1080 screen.
For desktop I think that it would work to have just one slider, for my own board size, and to fit the opponent boards into the left and right margins by calculating the scale factor which lets them both fit vertically, and the scale factor which lets them fit horizontally, and choosing the smaller of the two. I've made a mockup at cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-mockup.png which shows how much larger the boards can be without scrolling. • Welke browser gebruik je?
Google Chrome v79
-
• Wat stond op het scherm toen je geblokkeerd was (Leeg scherm? Een deel van de spelinterface? Foutboodschap?)
The sliders to change the sizes of the boards seem like a good idea, but my experience of trying to find a suitable size is that the problem isn't the board size but their position. It seems that the boards of the players to my left and right align with the bottom of the screen, and the boards of the fourth (and fifth, if applicable) player(s) go below the bottom of the screen unless using really tiny sizes.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-initial-sizes.png and cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-aligns-bottom.png show how making the opponent boards smaller pushes them down.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-fixed-margin.png was the best that I could manage to get the boards to fit on screen without scrolling, and even then I had to scroll down a little and lose some of the header. This is with a maximised browser window on a 1920x1080 screen.
For desktop I think that it would work to have just one slider, for my own board size, and to fit the opponent boards into the left and right margins by calculating the scale factor which lets them both fit vertically, and the scale factor which lets them fit horizontally, and choosing the smaller of the two. I've made a mockup at cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-mockup.png which shows how much larger the boards can be without scrolling. • Welke browser gebruik je?
Google Chrome v79
-
• Met welk onderdeel van de regels is geen rekening gehouden bij de BGA-versie?
The sliders to change the sizes of the boards seem like a good idea, but my experience of trying to find a suitable size is that the problem isn't the board size but their position. It seems that the boards of the players to my left and right align with the bottom of the screen, and the boards of the fourth (and fifth, if applicable) player(s) go below the bottom of the screen unless using really tiny sizes.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-initial-sizes.png and cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-aligns-bottom.png show how making the opponent boards smaller pushes them down.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-fixed-margin.png was the best that I could manage to get the boards to fit on screen without scrolling, and even then I had to scroll down a little and lose some of the header. This is with a maximised browser window on a 1920x1080 screen.
For desktop I think that it would work to have just one slider, for my own board size, and to fit the opponent boards into the left and right margins by calculating the scale factor which lets them both fit vertically, and the scale factor which lets them fit horizontally, and choosing the smaller of the two. I've made a mockup at cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-mockup.png which shows how much larger the boards can be without scrolling. -
• Is de inbreuk op de spelregels zichtbaar in de spelherhaling? Indien ja, bij welk zetnummer?
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Google Chrome v79
-
• Welke spelactie wilde je uitvoeren?
The sliders to change the sizes of the boards seem like a good idea, but my experience of trying to find a suitable size is that the problem isn't the board size but their position. It seems that the boards of the players to my left and right align with the bottom of the screen, and the boards of the fourth (and fifth, if applicable) player(s) go below the bottom of the screen unless using really tiny sizes.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-initial-sizes.png and cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-aligns-bottom.png show how making the opponent boards smaller pushes them down.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-fixed-margin.png was the best that I could manage to get the boards to fit on screen without scrolling, and even then I had to scroll down a little and lose some of the header. This is with a maximised browser window on a 1920x1080 screen.
For desktop I think that it would work to have just one slider, for my own board size, and to fit the opponent boards into the left and right margins by calculating the scale factor which lets them both fit vertically, and the scale factor which lets them fit horizontally, and choosing the smaller of the two. I've made a mockup at cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-mockup.png which shows how much larger the boards can be without scrolling. -
• Wat probeerde je te doen om deze spelactie te laten optreden?
-
• Wat gebeurde er toen je dit probeerde te doen (foutboodschap, melding op de statusbalk van het spel, ...)?
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Google Chrome v79
-
• In welke fase van het spel deed het probleem zich voor (wat was de huidige spelinstructie)?
The sliders to change the sizes of the boards seem like a good idea, but my experience of trying to find a suitable size is that the problem isn't the board size but their position. It seems that the boards of the players to my left and right align with the bottom of the screen, and the boards of the fourth (and fifth, if applicable) player(s) go below the bottom of the screen unless using really tiny sizes.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-initial-sizes.png and cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-aligns-bottom.png show how making the opponent boards smaller pushes them down.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-fixed-margin.png was the best that I could manage to get the boards to fit on screen without scrolling, and even then I had to scroll down a little and lose some of the header. This is with a maximised browser window on a 1920x1080 screen.
For desktop I think that it would work to have just one slider, for my own board size, and to fit the opponent boards into the left and right margins by calculating the scale factor which lets them both fit vertically, and the scale factor which lets them fit horizontally, and choosing the smaller of the two. I've made a mockup at cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-mockup.png which shows how much larger the boards can be without scrolling. -
• Wat gebeurde toen je deze spelactie probeerde (foutboodschap, melding op de statusbalk van het spel, ...)?
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Google Chrome v79
-
• Beschrijf alsjeblieft het probleem met de beeldweergave. Als je een screenshot van de bug hebt (goede gewoonte), kun je een afbeeldingswebsite gebruiken (bijvoorbeeld snipboard.io) om deze te uploaden en de link hier te delen.
The sliders to change the sizes of the boards seem like a good idea, but my experience of trying to find a suitable size is that the problem isn't the board size but their position. It seems that the boards of the players to my left and right align with the bottom of the screen, and the boards of the fourth (and fifth, if applicable) player(s) go below the bottom of the screen unless using really tiny sizes.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-initial-sizes.png and cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-aligns-bottom.png show how making the opponent boards smaller pushes them down.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-fixed-margin.png was the best that I could manage to get the boards to fit on screen without scrolling, and even then I had to scroll down a little and lose some of the header. This is with a maximised browser window on a 1920x1080 screen.
For desktop I think that it would work to have just one slider, for my own board size, and to fit the opponent boards into the left and right margins by calculating the scale factor which lets them both fit vertically, and the scale factor which lets them fit horizontally, and choosing the smaller of the two. I've made a mockup at cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-mockup.png which shows how much larger the boards can be without scrolling. • Welke browser gebruik je?
Google Chrome v79
-
• Kopieer en plak alsjeblieft de tekst die in het Engels wordt getoond in plaats van in jouw taal. Als je een screenshot van de bug hebt (goede gewoonte), kun je een afbeeldingswebsite gebruiken (bijvoorbeeld snipboard.io) om deze te uploaden en de link hier te delen. Is deze tekst beschikbaar in het vertaalsysteem? Zo ja, is deze meer dan 24 uur geleden vertaald?
The sliders to change the sizes of the boards seem like a good idea, but my experience of trying to find a suitable size is that the problem isn't the board size but their position. It seems that the boards of the players to my left and right align with the bottom of the screen, and the boards of the fourth (and fifth, if applicable) player(s) go below the bottom of the screen unless using really tiny sizes.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-initial-sizes.png and cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-aligns-bottom.png show how making the opponent boards smaller pushes them down.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-fixed-margin.png was the best that I could manage to get the boards to fit on screen without scrolling, and even then I had to scroll down a little and lose some of the header. This is with a maximised browser window on a 1920x1080 screen.
For desktop I think that it would work to have just one slider, for my own board size, and to fit the opponent boards into the left and right margins by calculating the scale factor which lets them both fit vertically, and the scale factor which lets them fit horizontally, and choosing the smaller of the two. I've made a mockup at cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-mockup.png which shows how much larger the boards can be without scrolling. • Welke browser gebruik je?
Google Chrome v79
-
• Gelieve jouw suggestie precies en beknopt uit te leggen zodat het zo makkelijk mogelijk is om te begrijpen wat je bedoelt.
The sliders to change the sizes of the boards seem like a good idea, but my experience of trying to find a suitable size is that the problem isn't the board size but their position. It seems that the boards of the players to my left and right align with the bottom of the screen, and the boards of the fourth (and fifth, if applicable) player(s) go below the bottom of the screen unless using really tiny sizes.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-initial-sizes.png and cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-aligns-bottom.png show how making the opponent boards smaller pushes them down.
cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-fixed-margin.png was the best that I could manage to get the boards to fit on screen without scrolling, and even then I had to scroll down a little and lose some of the header. This is with a maximised browser window on a 1920x1080 screen.
For desktop I think that it would work to have just one slider, for my own board size, and to fit the opponent boards into the left and right margins by calculating the scale factor which lets them both fit vertically, and the scale factor which lets them fit horizontally, and choosing the smaller of the two. I've made a mockup at cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/draftosaurus-mockup.png which shows how much larger the boards can be without scrolling. • Welke browser gebruik je?
Google Chrome v79
Rapportgeschiedenis
I think laying our the boards in the same way as the game Lucky Numbers would be beneficial, as all of the boards are the same size and can be viewed at once without either resizing or scrolling.
Dit rapport aanvullen
- Andere tafel ID / zet ID
- Loste F5 het probleem op?
- Kwam het probleem meerdere keren voor? Altijd? Willekeurig?
- Als je een screenshot van de bug hebt (goede gewoonte), kun je een afbeeldingswebsite gebruiken (bijvoorbeeld snipboard.io) om deze te uploaden en de link hier te delen.
