Alle rapporten
De Crew rapporten
#24131: "Logs contain all tricks when manual is explicit about only being able to go through the last one"
Waarover gaat dit rapport?
Wat is er gebeurd? Selecteer uit het onderstaande
Regels: een spelregel werd niet gerespecteerd
Gedetailleerde beschrijving
• Met welk onderdeel van de regels is geen rekening gehouden bij de BGA-versie?
Only the cards on the last trick can be examined, but as the logs show all tricks• Is de inbreuk op de spelregels zichtbaar in de spelherhaling? Indien ja, bij welk zetnummer?
Any• Welke browser gebruik je?
Mozilla v5
Rapportgeschiedenis
9 sep 2020 1:24 • panaggio • Bug is nog niet gereproduceerd door de ontwikkelaars:
Jaipur has a similar issue (you could easily go through logs and count cards and chips on another player's hand), so BGA's implementation hides anything but the last entry on the logs.
9 sep 2020 19:40 • phyphor • Bug is nog niet gereproduceerd door de ontwikkelaars:
It's a co-operative game, so keeping information visible that's already been made public isn't a bad thing.
Letting people keep checking the discard instead of playing, could be bad, but that isn't an issue in a digital version.
Letting people keep checking the discard instead of playing, could be bad, but that isn't an issue in a digital version.
4 okt 2020 4:18 • Remi_R • Bug is nog niet gereproduceerd door de ontwikkelaars:
The boardgame is also a co-operative game... I think if the conceptor put it as a rules it's because else it's making the cooperative game too much easy and then its decreasing the interest and the challenge which is an important part of a cooperative game.
5 okt 2020 13:33 • jade_alarm • Bug is nog niet gereproduceerd door de ontwikkelaars:
This is standard for online games, and necessary if you're playing asynchronously.
5 okt 2020 23:04 • Scott_Bailey • Bug is nog niet gereproduceerd door de ontwikkelaars:
With asynchronous play, only the last player would know what cards were played.
*If* a mechanism were created to show the last hand, that would satisfy this requirement; however, it would add significant bookkeeping for players.
It seems better to allow those players wanting the greater challenge to ignore the log.
*If* a mechanism were created to show the last hand, that would satisfy this requirement; however, it would add significant bookkeeping for players.
It seems better to allow those players wanting the greater challenge to ignore the log.
14 okt 2020 20:02 • dcorbin • Bug is nog niet gereproduceerd door de ontwikkelaars:
What a player should be able to see is the current trick, and the contents of the last trick. Nothing more. Granted, it will be pretty had to card-count in asynchronous play. BGA should support it like it is in real life,a nd if you (which it does not) and then allow a variant like "full game log" to support asynchronous play.
23 mrt 2021 17:21 • huehnerlady • Bug is nog niet gereproduceerd door de ontwikkelaars:
Does BGA support games without it being a log? I mean you have that history also to be able to replay a match so could be a hard limit of BGA?
If not you could make that an option in the creation screen of a game to play with/without log and then the players can decide what they wanna do
If not you could make that an option in the creation screen of a game to play with/without log and then the players can decide what they wanna do
15 mei 2022 15:32 • leocaseiro • Dit is geen bug:
As much as I agree with you, that there's a limitation on BGA platform, I don't think we could fix this issue. I suggest you don't read the logs.
Other than that, there isn't much I could do.
The way that BGA works, if we remove logs, we aren't able to get notified when another player triggers an action, such as playing a card.
Other than that, there isn't much I could do.
The way that BGA works, if we remove logs, we aren't able to get notified when another player triggers an action, such as playing a card.
15 mei 2022 17:54 • Tisaac • Dit is geen bug:
It's just hidden in the client but it's still here if you look at the DOM inspector, so it depends what you define "can be examined"
16 mei 2022 20:41 • leocaseiro • Bug is nog niet gereproduceerd door de ontwikkelaars:
Okay, I’ll add the the backlog to hide that from logs, similar what despesa is doing.
Dit rapport aanvullen
Gelieve hier alle informatie toe te voegen die relevant is om deze bug te reproduceren of jouw suggestie te begrijpen:
- Andere tafel ID / zet ID
- Loste F5 het probleem op?
- Kwam het probleem meerdere keren voor? Altijd? Willekeurig?
- Als je een schermafbeelding van deze bug hebt (goede gewoonte), kun je Imgur.com gebruiken om deze te uploaden, de link kopiëren en hier plakken.
