#21478: "Technology setup bug"
Waarover gaat dit rapport?
Wat is er gebeurd? Selecteer uit het onderstaande
Wat is er gebeurd? Selecteer uit het onderstaande
Gelieve na te kijken of er reeds een rapport bestaat met hetzelfde onderwerp
Zo ja, gelieve dan voor dit rapport te STEMMEN. Rapporten met de meeste stemmen krijgen VOORRANG!
# | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
---|
Gedetailleerde beschrijving
• Kopieer en plak alsjeblieft de foutboodschap die je op je scherm ziet, indien van toepassing.
I've played seventy-one games of Teotihuacan on BGA and have noticed that the technologies that cost two gold never appear on the top row (and, vice versa, the one-gold technologies never appear on the bottom row).
The instructions state that six of the nine technologies should be randomly selected and then placed in ascending numerical order. This means that all four of the one-gold technologies could be used in a game and thus one of them (#07) would be placed on the bottom row. Also, all five of the two-gold technologies could be used and thus two of them (#09 and #11) would be placed on the top row.
Perhaps a bug in the code is causing the problem. Could you please allow the one-gold technologies to be placed in the bottom row and the two-gold technologies to be placed in the top row? Doing so will allow for greater replay value and new, exciting gameplay. Thank you!• Leg uit wat je wilde doen, wat je deed en wat er gebeurde
N/A• Welke browser gebruik je?
Mozilla v5
• Kopieer en plak alsjeblieft de tekst die in het Engels wordt getoond in plaats van in jouw taal. Als je een schermafbeelding van deze bug hebt (goede gewoonte), kun je Imgur.com gebruiken om deze te uploaden, de link kopiëren en hier plakken.
I've played seventy-one games of Teotihuacan on BGA and have noticed that the technologies that cost two gold never appear on the top row (and, vice versa, the one-gold technologies never appear on the bottom row).
The instructions state that six of the nine technologies should be randomly selected and then placed in ascending numerical order. This means that all four of the one-gold technologies could be used in a game and thus one of them (#07) would be placed on the bottom row. Also, all five of the two-gold technologies could be used and thus two of them (#09 and #11) would be placed on the top row.
Perhaps a bug in the code is causing the problem. Could you please allow the one-gold technologies to be placed in the bottom row and the two-gold technologies to be placed in the top row? Doing so will allow for greater replay value and new, exciting gameplay. Thank you!• Is deze tekst beschikbaar in het vertaalsysteem? Zo ja, is deze meer dan 24 uur geleden vertaald?
N/A• Welke browser gebruik je?
Mozilla v5
• Gelieve jouw suggestie precies en beknopt uit te leggen zodat het zo makkelijk mogelijk is om te begrijpen wat je bedoelt.
I've played seventy-one games of Teotihuacan on BGA and have noticed that the technologies that cost two gold never appear on the top row (and, vice versa, the one-gold technologies never appear on the bottom row).
The instructions state that six of the nine technologies should be randomly selected and then placed in ascending numerical order. This means that all four of the one-gold technologies could be used in a game and thus one of them (#07) would be placed on the bottom row. Also, all five of the two-gold technologies could be used and thus two of them (#09 and #11) would be placed on the top row.
Perhaps a bug in the code is causing the problem. Could you please allow the one-gold technologies to be placed in the bottom row and the two-gold technologies to be placed in the top row? Doing so will allow for greater replay value and new, exciting gameplay. Thank you!• Welke browser gebruik je?
Mozilla v5
• Wat stond op het scherm toen je geblokkeerd was (Leeg scherm? Een deel van de spelinterface? Foutboodschap?)
I've played seventy-one games of Teotihuacan on BGA and have noticed that the technologies that cost two gold never appear on the top row (and, vice versa, the one-gold technologies never appear on the bottom row).
The instructions state that six of the nine technologies should be randomly selected and then placed in ascending numerical order. This means that all four of the one-gold technologies could be used in a game and thus one of them (#07) would be placed on the bottom row. Also, all five of the two-gold technologies could be used and thus two of them (#09 and #11) would be placed on the top row.
Perhaps a bug in the code is causing the problem. Could you please allow the one-gold technologies to be placed in the bottom row and the two-gold technologies to be placed in the top row? Doing so will allow for greater replay value and new, exciting gameplay. Thank you!• Welke browser gebruik je?
Mozilla v5
• Met welk onderdeel van de regels is geen rekening gehouden bij de BGA-versie?
I've played seventy-one games of Teotihuacan on BGA and have noticed that the technologies that cost two gold never appear on the top row (and, vice versa, the one-gold technologies never appear on the bottom row).
The instructions state that six of the nine technologies should be randomly selected and then placed in ascending numerical order. This means that all four of the one-gold technologies could be used in a game and thus one of them (#07) would be placed on the bottom row. Also, all five of the two-gold technologies could be used and thus two of them (#09 and #11) would be placed on the top row.
Perhaps a bug in the code is causing the problem. Could you please allow the one-gold technologies to be placed in the bottom row and the two-gold technologies to be placed in the top row? Doing so will allow for greater replay value and new, exciting gameplay. Thank you!• Is de inbreuk op de spelregels zichtbaar in de spelherhaling? Indien ja, bij welk zetnummer?
N/A• Welke browser gebruik je?
Mozilla v5
• Welke spelactie wilde je uitvoeren?
I've played seventy-one games of Teotihuacan on BGA and have noticed that the technologies that cost two gold never appear on the top row (and, vice versa, the one-gold technologies never appear on the bottom row).
The instructions state that six of the nine technologies should be randomly selected and then placed in ascending numerical order. This means that all four of the one-gold technologies could be used in a game and thus one of them (#07) would be placed on the bottom row. Also, all five of the two-gold technologies could be used and thus two of them (#09 and #11) would be placed on the top row.
Perhaps a bug in the code is causing the problem. Could you please allow the one-gold technologies to be placed in the bottom row and the two-gold technologies to be placed in the top row? Doing so will allow for greater replay value and new, exciting gameplay. Thank you!• Wat probeerde je te doen om deze spelactie te laten optreden?
N/A• Wat gebeurde er toen je dit probeerde te doen (foutboodschap, melding op de statusbalk van het spel, ...)?
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Mozilla v5
• In welke fase van het spel deed het probleem zich voor (wat was de huidige spelinstructie)?
I've played seventy-one games of Teotihuacan on BGA and have noticed that the technologies that cost two gold never appear on the top row (and, vice versa, the one-gold technologies never appear on the bottom row).
The instructions state that six of the nine technologies should be randomly selected and then placed in ascending numerical order. This means that all four of the one-gold technologies could be used in a game and thus one of them (#07) would be placed on the bottom row. Also, all five of the two-gold technologies could be used and thus two of them (#09 and #11) would be placed on the top row.
Perhaps a bug in the code is causing the problem. Could you please allow the one-gold technologies to be placed in the bottom row and the two-gold technologies to be placed in the top row? Doing so will allow for greater replay value and new, exciting gameplay. Thank you!• Wat gebeurde toen je deze spelactie probeerde (foutboodschap, melding op de statusbalk van het spel, ...)?
N/A• Welke browser gebruik je?
Mozilla v5
• Beschrijf alsjeblieft het probleem met de beeldweergave. Als je een schermafbeelding van deze bug hebt (goede gewoonte), kun je Imgur.com gebruiken om deze te uploaden, de link kopiëren en hier plakken.
I've played seventy-one games of Teotihuacan on BGA and have noticed that the technologies that cost two gold never appear on the top row (and, vice versa, the one-gold technologies never appear on the bottom row).
The instructions state that six of the nine technologies should be randomly selected and then placed in ascending numerical order. This means that all four of the one-gold technologies could be used in a game and thus one of them (#07) would be placed on the bottom row. Also, all five of the two-gold technologies could be used and thus two of them (#09 and #11) would be placed on the top row.
Perhaps a bug in the code is causing the problem. Could you please allow the one-gold technologies to be placed in the bottom row and the two-gold technologies to be placed in the top row? Doing so will allow for greater replay value and new, exciting gameplay. Thank you!• Welke browser gebruik je?
Mozilla v5
• Kopieer en plak alsjeblieft de tekst die in het Engels wordt getoond in plaats van in jouw taal. Als je een schermafbeelding van deze bug hebt (goede gewoonte), kun je Imgur.com gebruiken om deze te uploaden, de link kopiëren en hier plakken.
I've played seventy-one games of Teotihuacan on BGA and have noticed that the technologies that cost two gold never appear on the top row (and, vice versa, the one-gold technologies never appear on the bottom row).
The instructions state that six of the nine technologies should be randomly selected and then placed in ascending numerical order. This means that all four of the one-gold technologies could be used in a game and thus one of them (#07) would be placed on the bottom row. Also, all five of the two-gold technologies could be used and thus two of them (#09 and #11) would be placed on the top row.
Perhaps a bug in the code is causing the problem. Could you please allow the one-gold technologies to be placed in the bottom row and the two-gold technologies to be placed in the top row? Doing so will allow for greater replay value and new, exciting gameplay. Thank you!• Is deze tekst beschikbaar in het vertaalsysteem? Zo ja, is deze meer dan 24 uur geleden vertaald?
N/A• Welke browser gebruik je?
Mozilla v5
• Gelieve jouw suggestie precies en beknopt uit te leggen zodat het zo makkelijk mogelijk is om te begrijpen wat je bedoelt.
I've played seventy-one games of Teotihuacan on BGA and have noticed that the technologies that cost two gold never appear on the top row (and, vice versa, the one-gold technologies never appear on the bottom row).
The instructions state that six of the nine technologies should be randomly selected and then placed in ascending numerical order. This means that all four of the one-gold technologies could be used in a game and thus one of them (#07) would be placed on the bottom row. Also, all five of the two-gold technologies could be used and thus two of them (#09 and #11) would be placed on the top row.
Perhaps a bug in the code is causing the problem. Could you please allow the one-gold technologies to be placed in the bottom row and the two-gold technologies to be placed in the top row? Doing so will allow for greater replay value and new, exciting gameplay. Thank you!• Welke browser gebruik je?
Mozilla v5
Rapportgeschiedenis
It appears to be as the report describes.
The code first chooses one of the 1-gold tiles to exclude, and places the remaining ones in row 1.
Then it chooses two of the 2-gold tiles to exclude, and places the remaining ones in row 2.
Instead it should do something like the following:
* Select 6 tiles, and sort them.
* Place the first 3 tiles in row 1.
* Place the last 3 tiles in row 2.
github.com/salty-horse/bga-teotihuacan/commit/bug_21478
I'm working on a fix.
Dit rapport aanvullen
- Andere tafel ID / zet ID
- Loste F5 het probleem op?
- Kwam het probleem meerdere keren voor? Altijd? Willekeurig?
- Als je een schermafbeelding van deze bug hebt (goede gewoonte), kun je Imgur.com gebruiken om deze te uploaden, de link kopiëren en hier plakken.