#20752: "Cue bid should not be possible unless you hold the card that would be called"
Waarover gaat dit rapport?
Wat is er gebeurd? Selecteer uit het onderstaande
Wat is er gebeurd? Selecteer uit het onderstaande
Controleer of er al een rapport is over hetzelfde onderwerp
Zo ja, gelieve dan voor dit rapport te STEMMEN. Rapporten met de meeste stemmen krijgen VOORRANG!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Gedetailleerde beschrijving
-
• Kopieer en plak alsjeblieft de foutboodschap die je op je scherm ziet, indien van toepassing.
At move 256, a player made an inadvertent cue bid, inviting the 18 to be called. No one overbid, and he got the bid. But he said he did not have the card he had (accidentally) invited to be called. We thought a player was required to have the card they were inviting another bidder to call.
-
• Leg uit wat je wilde doen, wat je deed en wat er gebeurde
Check the hands at move 256 and see whether the player who made the cue bid actually had the 18.
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Firefox Quantum 67.0
-
• Kopieer en plak alsjeblieft de tekst die in het Engels wordt getoond in plaats van in jouw taal. Als je een screenshot van de bug hebt (goede gewoonte), kun je een afbeeldingswebsite gebruiken (bijvoorbeeld snipboard.io) om deze te uploaden en de link hier te delen. Is deze tekst beschikbaar in het vertaalsysteem? Zo ja, is deze meer dan 24 uur geleden vertaald?
At move 256, a player made an inadvertent cue bid, inviting the 18 to be called. No one overbid, and he got the bid. But he said he did not have the card he had (accidentally) invited to be called. We thought a player was required to have the card they were inviting another bidder to call.
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Firefox Quantum 67.0
-
• Gelieve jouw suggestie precies en beknopt uit te leggen zodat het zo makkelijk mogelijk is om te begrijpen wat je bedoelt.
At move 256, a player made an inadvertent cue bid, inviting the 18 to be called. No one overbid, and he got the bid. But he said he did not have the card he had (accidentally) invited to be called. We thought a player was required to have the card they were inviting another bidder to call.
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Firefox Quantum 67.0
-
• Wat stond op het scherm toen je geblokkeerd was (Leeg scherm? Een deel van de spelinterface? Foutboodschap?)
At move 256, a player made an inadvertent cue bid, inviting the 18 to be called. No one overbid, and he got the bid. But he said he did not have the card he had (accidentally) invited to be called. We thought a player was required to have the card they were inviting another bidder to call.
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Firefox Quantum 67.0
-
• Met welk onderdeel van de regels is geen rekening gehouden bij de BGA-versie?
At move 256, a player made an inadvertent cue bid, inviting the 18 to be called. No one overbid, and he got the bid. But he said he did not have the card he had (accidentally) invited to be called. We thought a player was required to have the card they were inviting another bidder to call.
-
• Is de inbreuk op de spelregels zichtbaar in de spelherhaling? Indien ja, bij welk zetnummer?
Check the hands at move 256 and see whether the player who made the cue bid actually had the 18.
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Firefox Quantum 67.0
-
• Welke spelactie wilde je uitvoeren?
At move 256, a player made an inadvertent cue bid, inviting the 18 to be called. No one overbid, and he got the bid. But he said he did not have the card he had (accidentally) invited to be called. We thought a player was required to have the card they were inviting another bidder to call.
-
• Wat probeerde je te doen om deze spelactie te laten optreden?
Check the hands at move 256 and see whether the player who made the cue bid actually had the 18.
-
• Wat gebeurde er toen je dit probeerde te doen (foutboodschap, melding op de statusbalk van het spel, ...)?
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Firefox Quantum 67.0
-
• In welke fase van het spel deed het probleem zich voor (wat was de huidige spelinstructie)?
At move 256, a player made an inadvertent cue bid, inviting the 18 to be called. No one overbid, and he got the bid. But he said he did not have the card he had (accidentally) invited to be called. We thought a player was required to have the card they were inviting another bidder to call.
-
• Wat gebeurde toen je deze spelactie probeerde (foutboodschap, melding op de statusbalk van het spel, ...)?
Check the hands at move 256 and see whether the player who made the cue bid actually had the 18.
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Firefox Quantum 67.0
-
• Beschrijf alsjeblieft het probleem met de beeldweergave. Als je een screenshot van de bug hebt (goede gewoonte), kun je een afbeeldingswebsite gebruiken (bijvoorbeeld snipboard.io) om deze te uploaden en de link hier te delen.
At move 256, a player made an inadvertent cue bid, inviting the 18 to be called. No one overbid, and he got the bid. But he said he did not have the card he had (accidentally) invited to be called. We thought a player was required to have the card they were inviting another bidder to call.
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Firefox Quantum 67.0
-
• Kopieer en plak alsjeblieft de tekst die in het Engels wordt getoond in plaats van in jouw taal. Als je een screenshot van de bug hebt (goede gewoonte), kun je een afbeeldingswebsite gebruiken (bijvoorbeeld snipboard.io) om deze te uploaden en de link hier te delen. Is deze tekst beschikbaar in het vertaalsysteem? Zo ja, is deze meer dan 24 uur geleden vertaald?
At move 256, a player made an inadvertent cue bid, inviting the 18 to be called. No one overbid, and he got the bid. But he said he did not have the card he had (accidentally) invited to be called. We thought a player was required to have the card they were inviting another bidder to call.
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Firefox Quantum 67.0
-
• Gelieve jouw suggestie precies en beknopt uit te leggen zodat het zo makkelijk mogelijk is om te begrijpen wat je bedoelt.
At move 256, a player made an inadvertent cue bid, inviting the 18 to be called. No one overbid, and he got the bid. But he said he did not have the card he had (accidentally) invited to be called. We thought a player was required to have the card they were inviting another bidder to call.
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Firefox Quantum 67.0
Rapportgeschiedenis
(a) as first bidder you can bid whatever you like, but if someone else accepts the presumed invitation, you must bid on to indicate that it wasn't actually an invitation
(b) if you don't hold the required card for an invitation, you must bid 3, but nobody else bids, you are then allowed to take fewer than 3 if you wish
(c) if you don't hold the required card for an invitation, you must bid 3, and if nobody else bids you must take 3
The last variant is somewhat marginal, the other two are widespread. My implementation uses (a) on the basis that in (b) we make life easier for the player with a strong hand. Force them to make a decision instead: "do I want to risk getting too many trumps, discarding some, and then winning a game of little value OR getting even fewer cards than I'd like and possibly struggling in a higher value game?"
BTW there are (quite wordy) tooltips provided for bidding button explaining what exactly each bid means. If a bid isn't legal then its button won't show up - anything you do see is legal to say. Admitedly the tooltips won't help you if you're using a touchscreen.
(Also, if you're doing very little cue-bidding, you're doing the right thing. That's meant for strong hands where the two high honours have a good chance of winning a game of one or solo with at least trull, even against the pagat and the XX. Under 6 trumps you shouldn't even consider a cue bid, but I'm not sure I've done it more than once or twice even with 6.)
Dit rapport aanvullen
- Andere tafel ID / zet ID
- Loste F5 het probleem op?
- Kwam het probleem meerdere keren voor? Altijd? Willekeurig?
- Als je een screenshot van de bug hebt (goede gewoonte), kun je een afbeeldingswebsite gebruiken (bijvoorbeeld snipboard.io) om deze te uploaden en de link hier te delen.
