#149942: "Assign Losses Automatically"

• Kopieer en plak alsjeblieft de foutboodschap die je op je scherm ziet, indien van toepassing.
(Not a bug, just a suggestion.) Currently the game pauses a lot to ask folks to pick which unit will take a loss in battle. But (unless I'm missing something) actually there's no need to do this in most cases because it's usually determined which type of unit has to take the loss, and there's no functional difference between different units in the same category. There are some times where players do have decisions to make, e.g. whether a highland or a non-Highland Metropolitan brigade will take a loss. But there's basically never a reason to take a loss on a Highland rather than another Metropolitan brigade, so even though this is technically a choice I don't think it needs to be on here when it'd slow things down. Which Indian unit to take as a loss sometimes does matter, e.g. in a multi-Year scenario you should preferably take as a loss a unit whose Village is going to be occupied at the start of next Year. So it'd be great to streamline this a bit. Also I'm not sure if the implementation currently always requires you to take losses on an already flipped unit, but 13.4 is clear that Reduced units have loss priority over Full in the same category, so that also removes the need for some decisions.

Thanks so much!
• Leg uit wat je wilde doen, wat je deed en wat er gebeurde
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Google Chrome v131

• Kopieer en plak alsjeblieft de tekst die in het Engels wordt getoond in plaats van in jouw taal. Als je een schermafbeelding van deze bug hebt (goede gewoonte), kun je Imgur.com gebruiken om deze te uploaden, de link kopiëren en hier plakken.
(Not a bug, just a suggestion.) Currently the game pauses a lot to ask folks to pick which unit will take a loss in battle. But (unless I'm missing something) actually there's no need to do this in most cases because it's usually determined which type of unit has to take the loss, and there's no functional difference between different units in the same category. There are some times where players do have decisions to make, e.g. whether a highland or a non-Highland Metropolitan brigade will take a loss. But there's basically never a reason to take a loss on a Highland rather than another Metropolitan brigade, so even though this is technically a choice I don't think it needs to be on here when it'd slow things down. Which Indian unit to take as a loss sometimes does matter, e.g. in a multi-Year scenario you should preferably take as a loss a unit whose Village is going to be occupied at the start of next Year. So it'd be great to streamline this a bit. Also I'm not sure if the implementation currently always requires you to take losses on an already flipped unit, but 13.4 is clear that Reduced units have loss priority over Full in the same category, so that also removes the need for some decisions.

Thanks so much!
• Is deze tekst beschikbaar in het vertaalsysteem? Zo ja, is deze meer dan 24 uur geleden vertaald?
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Google Chrome v131

• Gelieve jouw suggestie precies en beknopt uit te leggen zodat het zo makkelijk mogelijk is om te begrijpen wat je bedoelt.
(Not a bug, just a suggestion.) Currently the game pauses a lot to ask folks to pick which unit will take a loss in battle. But (unless I'm missing something) actually there's no need to do this in most cases because it's usually determined which type of unit has to take the loss, and there's no functional difference between different units in the same category. There are some times where players do have decisions to make, e.g. whether a highland or a non-Highland Metropolitan brigade will take a loss. But there's basically never a reason to take a loss on a Highland rather than another Metropolitan brigade, so even though this is technically a choice I don't think it needs to be on here when it'd slow things down. Which Indian unit to take as a loss sometimes does matter, e.g. in a multi-Year scenario you should preferably take as a loss a unit whose Village is going to be occupied at the start of next Year. So it'd be great to streamline this a bit. Also I'm not sure if the implementation currently always requires you to take losses on an already flipped unit, but 13.4 is clear that Reduced units have loss priority over Full in the same category, so that also removes the need for some decisions.

Thanks so much!
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Google Chrome v131

• Wat stond op het scherm toen je geblokkeerd was (Leeg scherm? Een deel van de spelinterface? Foutboodschap?)
(Not a bug, just a suggestion.) Currently the game pauses a lot to ask folks to pick which unit will take a loss in battle. But (unless I'm missing something) actually there's no need to do this in most cases because it's usually determined which type of unit has to take the loss, and there's no functional difference between different units in the same category. There are some times where players do have decisions to make, e.g. whether a highland or a non-Highland Metropolitan brigade will take a loss. But there's basically never a reason to take a loss on a Highland rather than another Metropolitan brigade, so even though this is technically a choice I don't think it needs to be on here when it'd slow things down. Which Indian unit to take as a loss sometimes does matter, e.g. in a multi-Year scenario you should preferably take as a loss a unit whose Village is going to be occupied at the start of next Year. So it'd be great to streamline this a bit. Also I'm not sure if the implementation currently always requires you to take losses on an already flipped unit, but 13.4 is clear that Reduced units have loss priority over Full in the same category, so that also removes the need for some decisions.

Thanks so much!
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Google Chrome v131

• Met welk onderdeel van de regels is geen rekening gehouden bij de BGA-versie?
(Not a bug, just a suggestion.) Currently the game pauses a lot to ask folks to pick which unit will take a loss in battle. But (unless I'm missing something) actually there's no need to do this in most cases because it's usually determined which type of unit has to take the loss, and there's no functional difference between different units in the same category. There are some times where players do have decisions to make, e.g. whether a highland or a non-Highland Metropolitan brigade will take a loss. But there's basically never a reason to take a loss on a Highland rather than another Metropolitan brigade, so even though this is technically a choice I don't think it needs to be on here when it'd slow things down. Which Indian unit to take as a loss sometimes does matter, e.g. in a multi-Year scenario you should preferably take as a loss a unit whose Village is going to be occupied at the start of next Year. So it'd be great to streamline this a bit. Also I'm not sure if the implementation currently always requires you to take losses on an already flipped unit, but 13.4 is clear that Reduced units have loss priority over Full in the same category, so that also removes the need for some decisions.

Thanks so much!
• Is de inbreuk op de spelregels zichtbaar in de spelherhaling? Indien ja, bij welk zetnummer?
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Google Chrome v131

• Welke spelactie wilde je uitvoeren?
(Not a bug, just a suggestion.) Currently the game pauses a lot to ask folks to pick which unit will take a loss in battle. But (unless I'm missing something) actually there's no need to do this in most cases because it's usually determined which type of unit has to take the loss, and there's no functional difference between different units in the same category. There are some times where players do have decisions to make, e.g. whether a highland or a non-Highland Metropolitan brigade will take a loss. But there's basically never a reason to take a loss on a Highland rather than another Metropolitan brigade, so even though this is technically a choice I don't think it needs to be on here when it'd slow things down. Which Indian unit to take as a loss sometimes does matter, e.g. in a multi-Year scenario you should preferably take as a loss a unit whose Village is going to be occupied at the start of next Year. So it'd be great to streamline this a bit. Also I'm not sure if the implementation currently always requires you to take losses on an already flipped unit, but 13.4 is clear that Reduced units have loss priority over Full in the same category, so that also removes the need for some decisions.

Thanks so much!
• Wat probeerde je te doen om deze spelactie te laten optreden?
• Wat gebeurde er toen je dit probeerde te doen (foutboodschap, melding op de statusbalk van het spel, ...)?
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Google Chrome v131

• In welke fase van het spel deed het probleem zich voor (wat was de huidige spelinstructie)?
(Not a bug, just a suggestion.) Currently the game pauses a lot to ask folks to pick which unit will take a loss in battle. But (unless I'm missing something) actually there's no need to do this in most cases because it's usually determined which type of unit has to take the loss, and there's no functional difference between different units in the same category. There are some times where players do have decisions to make, e.g. whether a highland or a non-Highland Metropolitan brigade will take a loss. But there's basically never a reason to take a loss on a Highland rather than another Metropolitan brigade, so even though this is technically a choice I don't think it needs to be on here when it'd slow things down. Which Indian unit to take as a loss sometimes does matter, e.g. in a multi-Year scenario you should preferably take as a loss a unit whose Village is going to be occupied at the start of next Year. So it'd be great to streamline this a bit. Also I'm not sure if the implementation currently always requires you to take losses on an already flipped unit, but 13.4 is clear that Reduced units have loss priority over Full in the same category, so that also removes the need for some decisions.

Thanks so much!
• Wat gebeurde toen je deze spelactie probeerde (foutboodschap, melding op de statusbalk van het spel, ...)?
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Google Chrome v131

• Beschrijf alsjeblieft het probleem met de beeldweergave. Als je een schermafbeelding van deze bug hebt (goede gewoonte), kun je Imgur.com gebruiken om deze te uploaden, de link kopiëren en hier plakken.
(Not a bug, just a suggestion.) Currently the game pauses a lot to ask folks to pick which unit will take a loss in battle. But (unless I'm missing something) actually there's no need to do this in most cases because it's usually determined which type of unit has to take the loss, and there's no functional difference between different units in the same category. There are some times where players do have decisions to make, e.g. whether a highland or a non-Highland Metropolitan brigade will take a loss. But there's basically never a reason to take a loss on a Highland rather than another Metropolitan brigade, so even though this is technically a choice I don't think it needs to be on here when it'd slow things down. Which Indian unit to take as a loss sometimes does matter, e.g. in a multi-Year scenario you should preferably take as a loss a unit whose Village is going to be occupied at the start of next Year. So it'd be great to streamline this a bit. Also I'm not sure if the implementation currently always requires you to take losses on an already flipped unit, but 13.4 is clear that Reduced units have loss priority over Full in the same category, so that also removes the need for some decisions.

Thanks so much!
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Google Chrome v131

• Kopieer en plak alsjeblieft de tekst die in het Engels wordt getoond in plaats van in jouw taal. Als je een schermafbeelding van deze bug hebt (goede gewoonte), kun je Imgur.com gebruiken om deze te uploaden, de link kopiëren en hier plakken.
(Not a bug, just a suggestion.) Currently the game pauses a lot to ask folks to pick which unit will take a loss in battle. But (unless I'm missing something) actually there's no need to do this in most cases because it's usually determined which type of unit has to take the loss, and there's no functional difference between different units in the same category. There are some times where players do have decisions to make, e.g. whether a highland or a non-Highland Metropolitan brigade will take a loss. But there's basically never a reason to take a loss on a Highland rather than another Metropolitan brigade, so even though this is technically a choice I don't think it needs to be on here when it'd slow things down. Which Indian unit to take as a loss sometimes does matter, e.g. in a multi-Year scenario you should preferably take as a loss a unit whose Village is going to be occupied at the start of next Year. So it'd be great to streamline this a bit. Also I'm not sure if the implementation currently always requires you to take losses on an already flipped unit, but 13.4 is clear that Reduced units have loss priority over Full in the same category, so that also removes the need for some decisions.

Thanks so much!
• Is deze tekst beschikbaar in het vertaalsysteem? Zo ja, is deze meer dan 24 uur geleden vertaald?
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Google Chrome v131

• Gelieve jouw suggestie precies en beknopt uit te leggen zodat het zo makkelijk mogelijk is om te begrijpen wat je bedoelt.
(Not a bug, just a suggestion.) Currently the game pauses a lot to ask folks to pick which unit will take a loss in battle. But (unless I'm missing something) actually there's no need to do this in most cases because it's usually determined which type of unit has to take the loss, and there's no functional difference between different units in the same category. There are some times where players do have decisions to make, e.g. whether a highland or a non-Highland Metropolitan brigade will take a loss. But there's basically never a reason to take a loss on a Highland rather than another Metropolitan brigade, so even though this is technically a choice I don't think it needs to be on here when it'd slow things down. Which Indian unit to take as a loss sometimes does matter, e.g. in a multi-Year scenario you should preferably take as a loss a unit whose Village is going to be occupied at the start of next Year. So it'd be great to streamline this a bit. Also I'm not sure if the implementation currently always requires you to take losses on an already flipped unit, but 13.4 is clear that Reduced units have loss priority over Full in the same category, so that also removes the need for some decisions.

Thanks so much!
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Google Chrome v131

Waarover gaat dit rapport?

Wat is er gebeurd? Selecteer uit het onderstaande

Wat is er gebeurd? Selecteer uit het onderstaande

Controleer of er al een rapport is over hetzelfde onderwerp

Gedetailleerde beschrijving

Rapportgeschiedenis

Dit rapport aanvullen

Wijzig rapportstatus naar:

Help

Draag bij

Volg ons