Alle rapporten
Go rapporten
#14642: "Couldn't remove stones after replaying"
fixed: Bug is opgelost
2
Waarover gaat dit rapport?
Wat is er gebeurd? Selecteer uit het onderstaande
De interface verhinderde mij een spelactie uit te voeren die volgens de regels is toegestaan
Gedetailleerde beschrijving
• Welke spelactie wilde je uitvoeren?
Remove stones from the board• Wat probeerde je te doen om deze spelactie te laten optreden?
We passed both, for the second time• Wat gebeurde er toen je dit probeerde te doen (foutboodschap, melding op de statusbalk van het spel, ...)?
No error• Welke browser gebruik je?
Google Chrome v80
Rapportgeschiedenis
16 mrt 2020 17:50 • Eragem • Bug is nog niet gereproduceerd door de ontwikkelaars:
We passed both first, then we go on the game because we were not agreed on dead stones, after that the game didn't propose us to remove stones
We passed both first, then we go on the game because we were not agreed on dead stones, after that the game didn't propose us to remove stones
8 mei 2020 22:09 • ODaly • Bug is nog niet gereproduceerd door de ontwikkelaars:
Also happened in 83225164. White had many dead groups which were not counted.
15 aug 2020 11:11 • stst • Bug is opgelost:
At now added: a way of agreement of an action for dead stones after next series of passes: After resume game players must now agree an action for dead stones after next series of passes.If each of them will answer Yes to the question: "Do you want to have a stage of designate dead stones after next series of passes?", then a stage of designate dead stones will be launched after next series of passes.
But if at least one of them will answer No, then any stones remaining on the board are deemed alive for counting the score at end of the game after next series of passes.
But if at least one of them will answer No, then any stones remaining on the board are deemed alive for counting the score at end of the game after next series of passes.
12 mrt 2025 14:29 • ElessarDunadan • Bug is opgelost:
This does not fix the bug, but rather allows for cheating. In my recent table, #642822106, my opponent selected "No". He was losing, and by selecting "no", he almost won the game. I only won because I was far enough ahead in points. However, Go is usually so close in score that every point makes a huge difference. This prevents people from playing by the rules.
Dit rapport aanvullen
Gelieve hier alle informatie toe te voegen die relevant is om deze bug te reproduceren of jouw suggestie te begrijpen:
- Andere tafel ID / zet ID
- Loste F5 het probleem op?
- Kwam het probleem meerdere keren voor? Altijd? Willekeurig?
- Als je een schermafbeelding van deze bug hebt (goede gewoonte), kun je Imgur.com gebruiken om deze te uploaden, de link kopiëren en hier plakken.
