#142853: "Conflict Fatigue dominance adjustment is not reset after Dominance Check"
Waarover gaat dit rapport?
Wat is er gebeurd? Selecteer uit het onderstaande
Wat is er gebeurd? Selecteer uit het onderstaande
Controleer of er al een rapport is over hetzelfde onderwerp
Zo ja, gelieve dan voor dit rapport te STEMMEN. Rapporten met de meeste stemmen krijgen VOORRANG!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Gedetailleerde beschrijving
-
• Kopieer en plak alsjeblieft de foutboodschap die je op je scherm ziet, indien van toepassing.
The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.
-
• Leg uit wat je wilde doen, wat je deed en wat er gebeurde
Yes; the relevant moves are 161 and 178.
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Safari v17.6
-
• Kopieer en plak alsjeblieft de tekst die in het Engels wordt getoond in plaats van in jouw taal. Als je een screenshot van de bug hebt (goede gewoonte), kun je een afbeeldingswebsite gebruiken (bijvoorbeeld snipboard.io) om deze te uploaden en de link hier te delen. Is deze tekst beschikbaar in het vertaalsysteem? Zo ja, is deze meer dan 24 uur geleden vertaald?
The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Safari v17.6
-
• Gelieve jouw suggestie precies en beknopt uit te leggen zodat het zo makkelijk mogelijk is om te begrijpen wat je bedoelt.
The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Safari v17.6
-
• Wat stond op het scherm toen je geblokkeerd was (Leeg scherm? Een deel van de spelinterface? Foutboodschap?)
The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Safari v17.6
-
• Met welk onderdeel van de regels is geen rekening gehouden bij de BGA-versie?
The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.
-
• Is de inbreuk op de spelregels zichtbaar in de spelherhaling? Indien ja, bij welk zetnummer?
Yes; the relevant moves are 161 and 178.
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Safari v17.6
-
• Welke spelactie wilde je uitvoeren?
The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.
-
• Wat probeerde je te doen om deze spelactie te laten optreden?
Yes; the relevant moves are 161 and 178.
-
• Wat gebeurde er toen je dit probeerde te doen (foutboodschap, melding op de statusbalk van het spel, ...)?
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Safari v17.6
-
• In welke fase van het spel deed het probleem zich voor (wat was de huidige spelinstructie)?
The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.
-
• Wat gebeurde toen je deze spelactie probeerde (foutboodschap, melding op de statusbalk van het spel, ...)?
Yes; the relevant moves are 161 and 178.
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Safari v17.6
-
• Beschrijf alsjeblieft het probleem met de beeldweergave. Als je een screenshot van de bug hebt (goede gewoonte), kun je een afbeeldingswebsite gebruiken (bijvoorbeeld snipboard.io) om deze te uploaden en de link hier te delen.
The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Safari v17.6
-
• Kopieer en plak alsjeblieft de tekst die in het Engels wordt getoond in plaats van in jouw taal. Als je een screenshot van de bug hebt (goede gewoonte), kun je een afbeeldingswebsite gebruiken (bijvoorbeeld snipboard.io) om deze te uploaden en de link hier te delen. Is deze tekst beschikbaar in het vertaalsysteem? Zo ja, is deze meer dan 24 uur geleden vertaald?
The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Safari v17.6
-
• Gelieve jouw suggestie precies en beknopt uit te leggen zodat het zo makkelijk mogelijk is om te begrijpen wat je bedoelt.
The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Safari v17.6
Rapportgeschiedenis
Dit rapport aanvullen
- Andere tafel ID / zet ID
- Loste F5 het probleem op?
- Kwam het probleem meerdere keren voor? Altijd? Willekeurig?
- Als je een screenshot van de bug hebt (goede gewoonte), kun je een afbeeldingswebsite gebruiken (bijvoorbeeld snipboard.io) om deze te uploaden en de link hier te delen.
