#14241: "ARENA mode players should be anonymous in team games, until the end of the game."
Wat is er gebeurd? Selecteer uit het onderstaande
Wat is er gebeurd? Selecteer uit het onderstaande
Gelieve na te kijken of er reeds een rapport bestaat met hetzelfde onderwerp
Zo ja, gelieve dan voor dit rapport te STEMMEN. Rapporten met de meeste stemmen krijgen VOORRANG!
# | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
---|
Gedetailleerde beschrijving
• Kopieer en plak alsjeblieft de foutboodschap die je op je scherm ziet, indien van toepassing.
This suggestion is relevant only for team games (such as 5v5, 2v2v2v2, 1v1v1v1v1 and so on).
In a competitive environment, being temporarily anonymous while playing has various advantages:
- Harder for players to cheat and boost a certain player.
- Makes victory the player's only goal: otherwise some players may just focus on whoever is the highest rank, or on whoever beat them earlier, or on whoever gets a certain color, and so on.
- Makes ELO much more meaningful: because external factors that should be irrelevant are removed (a player's name, a player's country of birth, a player's ELO, a player's age etc), the ELO will become a much better objective representation of the actual skill level of a player.
- Makes players accept losses easier: because they know the only reason someone targeted them is that the other player thought it was the best move, and not because of external factors such as country, name etc etc.
Before the start of the match player identities can be shown, as long as they are not paired with the color they will be in-game.
After the game is over, every player identity should be revealed as well as ELO changes, just like it happens now.• Leg uit wat je wilde doen, wat je deed en wat er gebeurde
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Irrelevant
• Kopieer en plak alsjeblieft de tekst die in het Engels wordt getoond in plaats van in jouw taal. Als je een schermafbeelding van deze bug hebt (goede gewoonte), kun je Imgur.com gebruiken om deze te uploaden, de link kopiëren en hier plakken.
This suggestion is relevant only for team games (such as 5v5, 2v2v2v2, 1v1v1v1v1 and so on).
In a competitive environment, being temporarily anonymous while playing has various advantages:
- Harder for players to cheat and boost a certain player.
- Makes victory the player's only goal: otherwise some players may just focus on whoever is the highest rank, or on whoever beat them earlier, or on whoever gets a certain color, and so on.
- Makes ELO much more meaningful: because external factors that should be irrelevant are removed (a player's name, a player's country of birth, a player's ELO, a player's age etc), the ELO will become a much better objective representation of the actual skill level of a player.
- Makes players accept losses easier: because they know the only reason someone targeted them is that the other player thought it was the best move, and not because of external factors such as country, name etc etc.
Before the start of the match player identities can be shown, as long as they are not paired with the color they will be in-game.
After the game is over, every player identity should be revealed as well as ELO changes, just like it happens now.• Is deze tekst beschikbaar in het vertaalsysteem? Zo ja, is deze meer dan 24 uur geleden vertaald?
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Irrelevant
• Gelieve jouw suggestie precies en beknopt uit te leggen zodat het zo makkelijk mogelijk is om te begrijpen wat je bedoelt.
This suggestion is relevant only for team games (such as 5v5, 2v2v2v2, 1v1v1v1v1 and so on).
In a competitive environment, being temporarily anonymous while playing has various advantages:
- Harder for players to cheat and boost a certain player.
- Makes victory the player's only goal: otherwise some players may just focus on whoever is the highest rank, or on whoever beat them earlier, or on whoever gets a certain color, and so on.
- Makes ELO much more meaningful: because external factors that should be irrelevant are removed (a player's name, a player's country of birth, a player's ELO, a player's age etc), the ELO will become a much better objective representation of the actual skill level of a player.
- Makes players accept losses easier: because they know the only reason someone targeted them is that the other player thought it was the best move, and not because of external factors such as country, name etc etc.
Before the start of the match player identities can be shown, as long as they are not paired with the color they will be in-game.
After the game is over, every player identity should be revealed as well as ELO changes, just like it happens now.• Welke browser gebruik je?
Irrelevant
• Wat stond op het scherm toen je geblokkeerd was (Leeg scherm? Een deel van de spelinterface? Foutboodschap?)
This suggestion is relevant only for team games (such as 5v5, 2v2v2v2, 1v1v1v1v1 and so on).
In a competitive environment, being temporarily anonymous while playing has various advantages:
- Harder for players to cheat and boost a certain player.
- Makes victory the player's only goal: otherwise some players may just focus on whoever is the highest rank, or on whoever beat them earlier, or on whoever gets a certain color, and so on.
- Makes ELO much more meaningful: because external factors that should be irrelevant are removed (a player's name, a player's country of birth, a player's ELO, a player's age etc), the ELO will become a much better objective representation of the actual skill level of a player.
- Makes players accept losses easier: because they know the only reason someone targeted them is that the other player thought it was the best move, and not because of external factors such as country, name etc etc.
Before the start of the match player identities can be shown, as long as they are not paired with the color they will be in-game.
After the game is over, every player identity should be revealed as well as ELO changes, just like it happens now.• Welke browser gebruik je?
Irrelevant
• Met welk onderdeel van de regels is geen rekening gehouden bij de BGA-versie?
This suggestion is relevant only for team games (such as 5v5, 2v2v2v2, 1v1v1v1v1 and so on).
In a competitive environment, being temporarily anonymous while playing has various advantages:
- Harder for players to cheat and boost a certain player.
- Makes victory the player's only goal: otherwise some players may just focus on whoever is the highest rank, or on whoever beat them earlier, or on whoever gets a certain color, and so on.
- Makes ELO much more meaningful: because external factors that should be irrelevant are removed (a player's name, a player's country of birth, a player's ELO, a player's age etc), the ELO will become a much better objective representation of the actual skill level of a player.
- Makes players accept losses easier: because they know the only reason someone targeted them is that the other player thought it was the best move, and not because of external factors such as country, name etc etc.
Before the start of the match player identities can be shown, as long as they are not paired with the color they will be in-game.
After the game is over, every player identity should be revealed as well as ELO changes, just like it happens now.• Is de inbreuk op de spelregels zichtbaar in de spelherhaling? Indien ja, bij welk zetnummer?
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Irrelevant
• Welke spelactie wilde je uitvoeren?
This suggestion is relevant only for team games (such as 5v5, 2v2v2v2, 1v1v1v1v1 and so on).
In a competitive environment, being temporarily anonymous while playing has various advantages:
- Harder for players to cheat and boost a certain player.
- Makes victory the player's only goal: otherwise some players may just focus on whoever is the highest rank, or on whoever beat them earlier, or on whoever gets a certain color, and so on.
- Makes ELO much more meaningful: because external factors that should be irrelevant are removed (a player's name, a player's country of birth, a player's ELO, a player's age etc), the ELO will become a much better objective representation of the actual skill level of a player.
- Makes players accept losses easier: because they know the only reason someone targeted them is that the other player thought it was the best move, and not because of external factors such as country, name etc etc.
Before the start of the match player identities can be shown, as long as they are not paired with the color they will be in-game.
After the game is over, every player identity should be revealed as well as ELO changes, just like it happens now.• Wat probeerde je te doen om deze spelactie te laten optreden?
• Wat gebeurde er toen je dit probeerde te doen (foutboodschap, melding op de statusbalk van het spel, ...)?
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Irrelevant
• In welke fase van het spel deed het probleem zich voor (wat was de huidige spelinstructie)?
This suggestion is relevant only for team games (such as 5v5, 2v2v2v2, 1v1v1v1v1 and so on).
In a competitive environment, being temporarily anonymous while playing has various advantages:
- Harder for players to cheat and boost a certain player.
- Makes victory the player's only goal: otherwise some players may just focus on whoever is the highest rank, or on whoever beat them earlier, or on whoever gets a certain color, and so on.
- Makes ELO much more meaningful: because external factors that should be irrelevant are removed (a player's name, a player's country of birth, a player's ELO, a player's age etc), the ELO will become a much better objective representation of the actual skill level of a player.
- Makes players accept losses easier: because they know the only reason someone targeted them is that the other player thought it was the best move, and not because of external factors such as country, name etc etc.
Before the start of the match player identities can be shown, as long as they are not paired with the color they will be in-game.
After the game is over, every player identity should be revealed as well as ELO changes, just like it happens now.• Wat gebeurde toen je deze spelactie probeerde (foutboodschap, melding op de statusbalk van het spel, ...)?
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Irrelevant
• Beschrijf alsjeblieft het probleem met de beeldweergave. Als je een schermafbeelding van deze bug hebt (goede gewoonte), kun je Imgur.com gebruiken om deze te uploaden, de link kopiëren en hier plakken.
This suggestion is relevant only for team games (such as 5v5, 2v2v2v2, 1v1v1v1v1 and so on).
In a competitive environment, being temporarily anonymous while playing has various advantages:
- Harder for players to cheat and boost a certain player.
- Makes victory the player's only goal: otherwise some players may just focus on whoever is the highest rank, or on whoever beat them earlier, or on whoever gets a certain color, and so on.
- Makes ELO much more meaningful: because external factors that should be irrelevant are removed (a player's name, a player's country of birth, a player's ELO, a player's age etc), the ELO will become a much better objective representation of the actual skill level of a player.
- Makes players accept losses easier: because they know the only reason someone targeted them is that the other player thought it was the best move, and not because of external factors such as country, name etc etc.
Before the start of the match player identities can be shown, as long as they are not paired with the color they will be in-game.
After the game is over, every player identity should be revealed as well as ELO changes, just like it happens now.• Welke browser gebruik je?
Irrelevant
• Kopieer en plak alsjeblieft de tekst die in het Engels wordt getoond in plaats van in jouw taal. Als je een schermafbeelding van deze bug hebt (goede gewoonte), kun je Imgur.com gebruiken om deze te uploaden, de link kopiëren en hier plakken.
This suggestion is relevant only for team games (such as 5v5, 2v2v2v2, 1v1v1v1v1 and so on).
In a competitive environment, being temporarily anonymous while playing has various advantages:
- Harder for players to cheat and boost a certain player.
- Makes victory the player's only goal: otherwise some players may just focus on whoever is the highest rank, or on whoever beat them earlier, or on whoever gets a certain color, and so on.
- Makes ELO much more meaningful: because external factors that should be irrelevant are removed (a player's name, a player's country of birth, a player's ELO, a player's age etc), the ELO will become a much better objective representation of the actual skill level of a player.
- Makes players accept losses easier: because they know the only reason someone targeted them is that the other player thought it was the best move, and not because of external factors such as country, name etc etc.
Before the start of the match player identities can be shown, as long as they are not paired with the color they will be in-game.
After the game is over, every player identity should be revealed as well as ELO changes, just like it happens now.• Is deze tekst beschikbaar in het vertaalsysteem? Zo ja, is deze meer dan 24 uur geleden vertaald?
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Irrelevant
• Gelieve jouw suggestie precies en beknopt uit te leggen zodat het zo makkelijk mogelijk is om te begrijpen wat je bedoelt.
This suggestion is relevant only for team games (such as 5v5, 2v2v2v2, 1v1v1v1v1 and so on).
In a competitive environment, being temporarily anonymous while playing has various advantages:
- Harder for players to cheat and boost a certain player.
- Makes victory the player's only goal: otherwise some players may just focus on whoever is the highest rank, or on whoever beat them earlier, or on whoever gets a certain color, and so on.
- Makes ELO much more meaningful: because external factors that should be irrelevant are removed (a player's name, a player's country of birth, a player's ELO, a player's age etc), the ELO will become a much better objective representation of the actual skill level of a player.
- Makes players accept losses easier: because they know the only reason someone targeted them is that the other player thought it was the best move, and not because of external factors such as country, name etc etc.
Before the start of the match player identities can be shown, as long as they are not paired with the color they will be in-game.
After the game is over, every player identity should be revealed as well as ELO changes, just like it happens now.• Welke browser gebruik je?
Irrelevant
Rapportgeschiedenis
Now, it is also not normally a problem to make a move on a "Turn Based" game and to go back to the start page, but in this instance, the person whom I was playing was online, and we began to play the game in real time. The next problem that occurred is that there is no prompt that an automatic "Real Time" game, whether "Arena Mode" or not, has started when you are currently playing another "Turn Based" game. If it is a "Simple Mode" game, then the game just won't start. However, if it is an "Arena Mode" game, it starts automatically, you are removed from the game, and receive penalties for abandoning the game.
I am including a screenshot of the notice that I received of my loss in Battle Sheep as soon as I finished my game of Nine Men's Morris.
imgur.com/a/rlUF4xm
There was no way for me to know that the game began, until I had already lost.
One of the primary goals of "Arena Mode" play is to foster an environment where people play games more freely. I assume that is the reason that players are not allowed to leave "Arena Mode" games. To prevent players from being able to screen their opponents.
There is, however, an alternative. If the names of players were not displayed until the game actually begins, then players would not be able to screen their opponents. This would allow the standard "Real-Time" game features to be implemented in "Arena Mode."
Currently for "Real-Time" games, if a player does not start the game, there is no penalty, because the game does not start. The same could be done in "Arena Mode." If a player does not choose to start their game within a short time period, they could be replaced with the next available player. If there are no other available players, then the table could just wait for the player to return.
Now, the other players also should not be penalized, if this turns out to be an extended period of time, so all players should be prompted to start the game again, if it takes more than a minute for the game to begin.
That is how I feel the problem should be resolved, but in the mean time, if you allow a player to go to a "Turn Based" game from the "Play Now" page with pending "Real Time" games, you would either prompt to cancel the games, or open the "Turn Based" game in a new tab.
Dit rapport aanvullen
- Andere tafel ID / zet ID
- Loste F5 het probleem op?
- Kwam het probleem meerdere keren voor? Altijd? Willekeurig?
- Als je een schermafbeelding van deze bug hebt (goede gewoonte), kun je Imgur.com gebruiken om deze te uploaden, de link kopiëren en hier plakken.