#117725: "The new (as of Mach 16) display of cards is IMHO not as good as the old one."
Waarover gaat dit rapport?
Wat is er gebeurd? Selecteer uit het onderstaande
Wat is er gebeurd? Selecteer uit het onderstaande
Controleer of er al een rapport is over hetzelfde onderwerp
Zo ja, gelieve dan voor dit rapport te STEMMEN. Rapporten met de meeste stemmen krijgen VOORRANG!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Gedetailleerde beschrijving
-
• Kopieer en plak alsjeblieft de foutboodschap die je op je scherm ziet, indien van toepassing.
The display, while staying more compact, creates views where the stack on the left, having gotten long and been split into 2 stacks, covers up the next stack over on the right. So for example, I was not able to see the opponent's Actions cards once his Effects stack went over to 2 columns.
In general, aside from that headache, I found the original display to be superior to the new one (although the display areas were a lot taller on the screen, once many cards had been played). -
• Leg uit wat je wilde doen, wat je deed en wat er gebeurde
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Google Chrome v109
-
• Kopieer en plak alsjeblieft de tekst die in het Engels wordt getoond in plaats van in jouw taal. Als je een screenshot van de bug hebt (goede gewoonte), kun je een afbeeldingswebsite gebruiken (bijvoorbeeld snipboard.io) om deze te uploaden en de link hier te delen. Is deze tekst beschikbaar in het vertaalsysteem? Zo ja, is deze meer dan 24 uur geleden vertaald?
The display, while staying more compact, creates views where the stack on the left, having gotten long and been split into 2 stacks, covers up the next stack over on the right. So for example, I was not able to see the opponent's Actions cards once his Effects stack went over to 2 columns.
In general, aside from that headache, I found the original display to be superior to the new one (although the display areas were a lot taller on the screen, once many cards had been played). • Welke browser gebruik je?
Google Chrome v109
-
• Gelieve jouw suggestie precies en beknopt uit te leggen zodat het zo makkelijk mogelijk is om te begrijpen wat je bedoelt.
The display, while staying more compact, creates views where the stack on the left, having gotten long and been split into 2 stacks, covers up the next stack over on the right. So for example, I was not able to see the opponent's Actions cards once his Effects stack went over to 2 columns.
In general, aside from that headache, I found the original display to be superior to the new one (although the display areas were a lot taller on the screen, once many cards had been played). • Welke browser gebruik je?
Google Chrome v109
-
• Wat stond op het scherm toen je geblokkeerd was (Leeg scherm? Een deel van de spelinterface? Foutboodschap?)
The display, while staying more compact, creates views where the stack on the left, having gotten long and been split into 2 stacks, covers up the next stack over on the right. So for example, I was not able to see the opponent's Actions cards once his Effects stack went over to 2 columns.
In general, aside from that headache, I found the original display to be superior to the new one (although the display areas were a lot taller on the screen, once many cards had been played). • Welke browser gebruik je?
Google Chrome v109
-
• Met welk onderdeel van de regels is geen rekening gehouden bij de BGA-versie?
The display, while staying more compact, creates views where the stack on the left, having gotten long and been split into 2 stacks, covers up the next stack over on the right. So for example, I was not able to see the opponent's Actions cards once his Effects stack went over to 2 columns.
In general, aside from that headache, I found the original display to be superior to the new one (although the display areas were a lot taller on the screen, once many cards had been played). -
• Is de inbreuk op de spelregels zichtbaar in de spelherhaling? Indien ja, bij welk zetnummer?
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Google Chrome v109
-
• Welke spelactie wilde je uitvoeren?
The display, while staying more compact, creates views where the stack on the left, having gotten long and been split into 2 stacks, covers up the next stack over on the right. So for example, I was not able to see the opponent's Actions cards once his Effects stack went over to 2 columns.
In general, aside from that headache, I found the original display to be superior to the new one (although the display areas were a lot taller on the screen, once many cards had been played). -
• Wat probeerde je te doen om deze spelactie te laten optreden?
-
• Wat gebeurde er toen je dit probeerde te doen (foutboodschap, melding op de statusbalk van het spel, ...)?
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Google Chrome v109
-
• In welke fase van het spel deed het probleem zich voor (wat was de huidige spelinstructie)?
The display, while staying more compact, creates views where the stack on the left, having gotten long and been split into 2 stacks, covers up the next stack over on the right. So for example, I was not able to see the opponent's Actions cards once his Effects stack went over to 2 columns.
In general, aside from that headache, I found the original display to be superior to the new one (although the display areas were a lot taller on the screen, once many cards had been played). -
• Wat gebeurde toen je deze spelactie probeerde (foutboodschap, melding op de statusbalk van het spel, ...)?
• Welke browser gebruik je?
Google Chrome v109
-
• Beschrijf alsjeblieft het probleem met de beeldweergave. Als je een screenshot van de bug hebt (goede gewoonte), kun je een afbeeldingswebsite gebruiken (bijvoorbeeld snipboard.io) om deze te uploaden en de link hier te delen.
The display, while staying more compact, creates views where the stack on the left, having gotten long and been split into 2 stacks, covers up the next stack over on the right. So for example, I was not able to see the opponent's Actions cards once his Effects stack went over to 2 columns.
In general, aside from that headache, I found the original display to be superior to the new one (although the display areas were a lot taller on the screen, once many cards had been played). • Welke browser gebruik je?
Google Chrome v109
-
• Kopieer en plak alsjeblieft de tekst die in het Engels wordt getoond in plaats van in jouw taal. Als je een screenshot van de bug hebt (goede gewoonte), kun je een afbeeldingswebsite gebruiken (bijvoorbeeld snipboard.io) om deze te uploaden en de link hier te delen. Is deze tekst beschikbaar in het vertaalsysteem? Zo ja, is deze meer dan 24 uur geleden vertaald?
The display, while staying more compact, creates views where the stack on the left, having gotten long and been split into 2 stacks, covers up the next stack over on the right. So for example, I was not able to see the opponent's Actions cards once his Effects stack went over to 2 columns.
In general, aside from that headache, I found the original display to be superior to the new one (although the display areas were a lot taller on the screen, once many cards had been played). • Welke browser gebruik je?
Google Chrome v109
-
• Gelieve jouw suggestie precies en beknopt uit te leggen zodat het zo makkelijk mogelijk is om te begrijpen wat je bedoelt.
The display, while staying more compact, creates views where the stack on the left, having gotten long and been split into 2 stacks, covers up the next stack over on the right. So for example, I was not able to see the opponent's Actions cards once his Effects stack went over to 2 columns.
In general, aside from that headache, I found the original display to be superior to the new one (although the display areas were a lot taller on the screen, once many cards had been played). • Welke browser gebruik je?
Google Chrome v109
Rapportgeschiedenis
There was a deployment bug some hours ago which has been fixed, does the problem still persist now ?
I just finished a game (about midnight on the 17th, Central time) ; same behavior was present.
Note that this is not fatal; I can select the "synthetic" display mode and that does not seem to crowd out its neighbors.
If I switch into mobile view, they show up: i.imgur.com/xbTRG61.png
Also if I scroll down to my opponent's screen you can see that they're stacked like this guy was saying:
i.imgur.com/1CZjWju.png
It looks fine in Firefox on windows: 124.0.1 (64-bit)
I'm having this graphical issue in Linux: 115.9.1esr-1~deb12u1
Two solutions I've found are:
- Style bot and manually tweak the width to match what it needs to be
- Switch to Synthetic. It seems that it properly expands when in "synthetic" mode. Also the expansion isn't quite as necessary in this mode.
Dit rapport aanvullen
- Andere tafel ID / zet ID
- Loste F5 het probleem op?
- Kwam het probleem meerdere keren voor? Altijd? Willekeurig?
- Als je een screenshot van de bug hebt (goede gewoonte), kun je een afbeeldingswebsite gebruiken (bijvoorbeeld snipboard.io) om deze te uploaden en de link hier te delen.
){kind=link}
